high quality: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YrAx7ab0aw&fmt=18
as extracted from http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/nca/simulations/1989/
Explanation of Colors
The movies color the landscape in each frame according to the maximum (peak) intensity of shaking (amplitude of the ground motion) up to that point in time. In order to show the intensity of the current shaking, the colors darken as the shaking intensifies. At some locations, the most intense shaking lasts for several seconds, so the colors will darken as seismic waves continue to cause strong shaking.
Comparison with 1906 Earthquake
One striking observation for those who experienced the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake's shaking is the comparison of the extent and intensity of shaking with the 1906 earthquake. The Loma Prieta rupture was about 30 times smaller in energy than the great 1906 earthquake.
The rupture in the Loma Prieta earthquake began at a depth of about 19.2km (12 miles) and appears to have ruptured a 40km (25 miles) long portion of the San Andreas fault. Unlike the 1906 earthquake, the rupture in the Loma Prieta earthquake did not reach the surface. As in the 1906 earthquake, the strongest shaking was concentrated along the fault. In 1989 the two areas of most intense shaking were north and south of the epicenter in the Santa Cruz mountains.
Shaking in the Marina District and Oakland
The simulations do not single out either the Marina District or Oakland as having experienced especially strong shaking. These computer simulations resolve features as small as 195m (650 feet) in scale. However, this means that they do not include the amplification of shaking or liquefaction that occurs as a result of thin sedimentary deposits, such as bay mud. Additionally, the computer simulations do not include the shaking at frequencies higher than 0.5 Hz. Including these additional small-scale effects explains the extensive damage in these areas. Future versions of the computer ground motion simulation models will also include these effects.
Role 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake in 1906 Simulations
The 1989 magnitude 6.9 Loma Prieta earthquake was used to validate the computer simulations, because a large number of instrumental observations are available from that event. If the models had not been able to reproduce the shaking in the Loma Prieta event, we would not have confidence in the reconstructions of he 1906 earthquake. In fact, the simulations produce motions that agree quite well with the observations from the Loma Prieta earthquake.
Wow. Sucks to be in Gilroy at the time. I was 8 in San Jose when it struck. Caused a fire in our house :( What a mess!
PacoBell 7 months ago
Yup, I was in Menlo Park, my dad was in Campbell. He was CONVINCED that the building he had (luckily) just left was going to collapse.
bekki650 1 year ago