Bugs are Better at Science

http://www.icr.org/article/animal-kingdom-already-had-underwater/
Real Science:
In 2010 a team of researchers from Israeli and British universities discovered that the yellow stripe in the hornet's abdomen is capable of harvesting the sun's light and converting it into energy. In fact, the main metabolic activity occurs in that yellow pigment layer (i.e. the sun may be its main energy source). The process is made possible by a pigment called xanthopterin. This might explain why the insects are more active during intense sunlight, unlike most hornets. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oriental_hornet.

It has been suggested that the Oriental hornet uses xanthopterin as a light harvesting molecule to transform light into electrical energy, which may explain why the insects are more active when light intensity is greater. Although no explicit biochemical mechanism has been determined for this animal light to energy conversion system, it remains an active and important area of scientific research (Plotkin et al., Naturwissenschaften (2010) 97:1067--1076).

Karl Priest the Insect man
http://www.insectman.us
Karl (The Insect Man) Priest Play List
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=2017A89796441B37
Thank God for Insects Which Drive Evolutionists Buggy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1bq8AmANBk

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Jacques
• Cousteau
• Tel
• Aviv
• University
• Oriental
• hornet
• xanthopterin

[Craigmw45]

@coolvideo28 And about the only thing you have managed to argue is that carbon dating is wrong. so therefor the earth must be young. Which is an idiotic assertion since carbon dating is not a method we use to date the earth.

Rather then simply assert you have discredited every dating method we have, why don't you focus your efforts on dating methods we use. Start with high school trig... After that it gets a little more advanced...

[Craigmw45]

@coolvideo28 The bible is your dating method? Perhaps you could elaborate by showing one historical fact that the bible got unequivocally right.

Surely as being the factual document it is, it should agree with the writings and historical accounts of everyone else alive on the earth at the same time.

Please just one thing the bible got right

[coolvideo28]

I dont know if your slow or what I answered you at least 3 times already there is no acurate dating method exept history the Bible is the only perfect record of history, thats it If you cant understand this I dont know what to tell you.

[Craigmw45]

@coolvideo28 Perhaps if everything in science is wrong, including basic geometry, you could come up with at least one dating method that arrives at a date of less then 10,000 years old.

This is the 4th(?) time I have asked you directly to name a method, yet you still have not.

[coolvideo28]

@Craigmw45 No I answered the direct question there are no acurate dating methods None all evol. dating methods R circular reasoning 1 more time just to make sure U understand there R no acurate dating methods. The only thing we can use to acuratly date history is the Bible Gods living word. You can go through the geneology from Adam the 1st man to Jesus Christs death & resurection this is the only acurate dating method from the begining of time until present obviously throwing in the 2011AD

[Craigmw45]

@coolvideo28 You must have missed the direct question. Can you name one dating method that gives the age of the earth at less then 10,000 years old.

There are hundreds of ways we can measure the age of the earth or the universe, more then 10k yo, some of which are no complex then measuring a triangle (star paralex) so surely you could find one that gives a date somewhat in agreement with what your saying.

[coolvideo28]

@Craigmw45 I am not only saying that C-14 is wrong and proves evol. wrong, but all of the dating methods are wrong there circular reasoning. There is no acurate dating method we only have History to rely on and even that can be swayed look at the completly biased history channel that has no problem re writing history to what they want it to be. So we have to trust the only perfect history we have one that has never been proven wrong because its perfect Gods living word the Bible.

[Craigmw45]

@coolvideo28 You've been trying to say that C14 dating doesn't work. So lets say for the sake of argument your right, how in the world does that imply that the earth is young? Or what if anything does that have to do with evolution?

Heck it would be immensely impressive if you could name even one dating method that give an age of the earth less then 10,000 years.

[coolvideo28]

@Craigmw45 I explained why C-14 proves evol. a scam several times in these comments read them. Nothing can prove the earth is more then 10,000.

[Craigmw45]

@coolvideo28 No I don't think your right at all. But elaborate on why you think debunking C-14 dating proves a young earth.

It doesn't at all, all you can say from that is that C-14 dating doesn't work.

And do you know how many fundamental aspects of science are used to give an age of the earth of more then 10,000 years old. And I really mean fundamental, even the evil triangle can be used, to measure and age of the earth of more then 10 000 years old.