'Star Trek' review by Michael Phillips
Top Comments
All Comments (78)
-
"Three Stars"????
How about "No Stars" for JJ Abrams' ill concieved, plothole filled, badly filmed, sci-fi film which simply contained elements of Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek.
That's where the similarities end.
-
Soylent Green is people.
-
For true Origins of Kirk see the video Star Trek Origins: Kirk. Why? Because this movie was not an origin movie it was a prequel, sequel, reboot, screw up the characters to copy Twilight movie.
-
Way too many lense flares in this film. It was rather distracting.
-
Thanks Michael Phillips. I've never seen Citizen Kane. Thanks a lot.
-
@Sysminsays Allot of bad movies make lots of money. Episodes 1-3 made a ton of cash, Abrams Mission Imposible III did well, and it was shit too. The Tranformers movies were garbage and thay made huge money. So making money doesn't make a movie good, it just makes the people who went stupid.
-
How can he not like this as much as I do? There must be something wrong with his brain.
-
@fecxor: Trust me I know this to be true...Toy story and Twilight comes to mind, but they are for me. Doesn't make them bad movies because somebody (quite a few) got it. They did a good job with Trek and I look forward to the next one.
-
This movie was badass!
For long term startrek fans it was a bitching movie, for people who've never watched an episode of star trek in there life? It was a kickass movie!!
Just a great movie!!!
-
My favourite film in Outer Space...not joking
No where's JJ Abrams so I can clean his house and kiss his shoes?
The movie made 149 million over the weekend. It was a great film, so haters can set their phasers to " shut the fuck up"
Sysminsays 2 years ago 27
just saw it, and it was absolutely brilliant/spectakular, unlike this review.
Hbedding 2 years ago 6