there are no lifeless planetary bodies. NASA have always known that. You can process information , analyze it and reproduce the evidence that supports the determination of a particular conclusion.
NASA can analyze information , collect it , store it , and evaluate it , but they cannot reproduce it , or process it. That´s the difference. You can , but they can´t. So I understand their envy. They can write big books about space and all that though........
Lets not forget NASA for over 30 years have been telling us the Moon is a dead rock. No water, dry as a desert. Well guess what. It's not. And now images from space tells us that there is a 'Goldylocks' planet that astronomers say 'most likely' supports life. It's not SyFY anymore it's becoming fact.
The one thing I have learned about Hoagland is he has the research to back it up. Regardless of what you think , his statements are backed by research, proof, whatever you want to call it. Don't knock it till you read it.
how can a ship be torn apart by mere tidal forces ? this guy is not scieintist .. so phobos has mica .. so what? ..this is hyper dimensional hyper delusion
there are no lifeless planetary bodies. NASA have always known that. You can process information , analyze it and reproduce the evidence that supports the determination of a particular conclusion.
NASA can analyze information , collect it , store it , and evaluate it , but they cannot reproduce it , or process it. That´s the difference. You can , but they can´t. So I understand their envy. They can write big books about space and all that though........
mzedong001 1 year ago
@mzedong001
lol yeah, that dude is fuckin screwd! :)))))
drejtool 1 year ago
Lets not forget NASA for over 30 years have been telling us the Moon is a dead rock. No water, dry as a desert. Well guess what. It's not. And now images from space tells us that there is a 'Goldylocks' planet that astronomers say 'most likely' supports life. It's not SyFY anymore it's becoming fact.
berpete 1 year ago
The one thing I have learned about Hoagland is he has the research to back it up. Regardless of what you think , his statements are backed by research, proof, whatever you want to call it. Don't knock it till you read it.
berpete 1 year ago
Lol! Funny , paranoid style comment!!!!
mzedong001 1 year ago
how can a ship be torn apart by mere tidal forces ? this guy is not scieintist .. so phobos has mica .. so what? ..this is hyper dimensional hyper delusion
JOOODYJOOODY 1 year ago