Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

HHO Iced Electrolyte & Ultra-sonics ©

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,523
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 6, 2007

This was done with 1.5 Liters RO filter Water & RO filter Ice 1/8th tsp Lye 90 VDC and 5.5Amp & and a Ultra-sonic Device running.
So far the gas proves to be a lot more reactive upon combustion. The bubbles pop with a snap that is not there at higher temperatures. Tonight when I get Home I am going to try a Slush Puppy mode, and measure the gas. Run it twice and monitor the temperature rise, and run with and without the ultra-sonics. If I get ambitious maybe a family of curves.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (AllgoodAutomation)

  • And how did you employ ultrasonics? I have used high frequency sound in my reactors basically as a vibrator to knock the bubbles off the plates but cannot confirm that this actually contributed to the reaction.

  • Its a Unit I purchased from the internet. I have not confirmed that it really does any thing except help remove bubbles from the plates and the solution. The Gas Also seems to be a little different in combustibility. No experiment yet to confirm any of this. It's coming.

  • So what were your conclusions? I had heard that the optimum reaction temperature was about 150F. Are you putting forward that a chilled reactor is more effective?

  • All I am Saying is the gas seems to be more reactive. I am working on a method to measure the energy content. Not yet ready

see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hehe sounds like popping bubblewrap :D

  • Ok ... I had heard a rather mystical explanation at some point that sound and/or light could actually enhance gas production volumes but have never seen a way to prove it ... thought you might be working in that direction ...

  • I think that if you took a known volume of gas produced in chilled reactor and same from normal reactor; bring both gas sample to same temp; ignite; same potency ... but yes, a cooler more dense gas will be more reactive ... so the chiller need to be at the intake into the ICE, not necessarily at the reactor ... my thoughts only, no proof ...

  • Actually, it is possible to use voltages well beyond 90v and get higher production volumes ... efficiency suffers and you do get waste heat that you have to dispose of but you can get higher gas volume ... so it depends on what you want to get done ...

  • 90 Volt DC is way to high, a deadly dangerous.

    1.50 volt DC / Cell is around optimal.

    And RO water is so clean that you produce more

    heat then H2+O2= Hydroxy gas;

    ( HHO gas does not exist it's hydroxy).

    You need an electrolyte.

    But i like to know what the ultrasonic effects are.

  • Thanks for your replies. Hope you can draw some conslusions and post your results. I suspect I am not the only one interested in what you find out.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more