Bible Believer Bloopers

False Doctrine originates from false definitions. False definitions originate from people imposing their ideas of the definitions, on the Bible.

Bible often uses the same term in many different ways, to denote different KINDS of a thing. More than one kind of salvation, because you are more than one kind of nature, life: so your LOCATION is saved immediately to heaven the first nanosecond you believe in Christ, hence you are 'saved', alright.

But what about your soul's thinking? It needs saving too: so you get 1John1:9 and Bible to learn and live on, while down here. You have no fellowship with God apart from naming sins to Him, even as the OT people didn't. They had to bring an animal too, but Christ now has Paid, so we don't bring animals. So that's a 'salvation': of your fellowship, maturation in thinking like Christ does, 1Cor2.

Then 1Cor3, at the end your body is saved, in the sense that you get a new one, 1Cor15. So three types of salvation, to go with the three parts of the believer: body, soul, spirit: 3 types of 'life'. For God is Spiritual Life, and that's why salvation to HEAVEN is permanent.

So too, seven kinds of baptism, several types of doors, seven ministries of the Spirit, etc. Just as there are many kinds of fish. But they aren't the SAME fish.

False doctrine is always derived from ASSuming only ONE kind of a thing. For example, the Calvinists ASSume only one kind of election, but Bible lists four different kinds, all of which are housed IN CHRIST. So Calvinism is flat wrong on everything it says, due to this misdefinition. Calvinism borrows from Augustine just like Catholicism does, and therefore shares in its falsehoods.

Same with KJVO: they ASSume only one Bible manuscript and translation (ignoring even the fact that the KJV is famously mistranslated in many verses, that's why new English translations keep on being made). So their false doctrine alike comes from an extra-Biblical ASSumption proved erroneous, which they won't give up, even as the Calvinists won't give up their slavish insistence on Calvin, even where he was wrong. And Calvin, was addicted to Augustine, not Bible.

Same too, with the idiotic young-earth crowd. They use Bishop Ussher's misreading of Genesis 5 (like the Jews before him), rather than Bible's Genesis 1:1, 1:2, Isaiah 45:7, 18-19. More than one creation, per Bible.

Popism takes many forms, and in every case, it's an insistence on ONE HUMAN source OUTSIDE BIBLE, for definition. So don't make that mistake, when you read Bible. God is the ONE to tell you what HE says. Use 1John1:9 and ASK HIM what His Word means. Or, you'll be like a goldfish attached to a fake shark fin. :)

Production Note: the original upload of this video was on the HateYourSinNow channel, of which I am a member. But in light of the upcoming series on RFG Book of Hebrews, this video should also be posted here. For the misreading of Hebrews, stems from people imposing their false ideas onto it.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• False
• Doctrine
• Bible
• misinterpretation
• Calvinism
• Arminianism
• Augustine
• Judaism
• Oneness
• Election
• Predestination
• Denominations
• Preterism
• JW
• SDA
• Jehovah's
• Witnesses
• Seventh
• Day
• Adventists
• Riplinger
• Ruckman
• Ellen
• White
• Charles
• Taze
• Russell
• Millerite
• evolution
• Black
• Israelites
• Baptist
• Anabaptist
• Anglican
• Catholic
• cult
• KJVO
• King
• James
• Only

[GhostFace178]

OH WOW! its so clear now i get it! iv been wrong this whole time! thank you so much! im gunna show this to the world and everybody will believe and convert!

Hahaha this is rich thanks for the upload really.. you hear that YouTube, brainouty says our doctrine isnt bible based.. hahaha Go back to your traditions and your priest and ask for salvation so you can get what Christ couldnt do, or wait! didnt i read some where that ahhh Christ said "it is FINISHED"

[brainouty]

@GhostFace178 Oh Wow! You can't read channel pages, and ASSume your OWN OPINION is Truth! So you ASSume that I have traditions and am what? DUMMY you just proved your own comment completely worthless, that you have NO SPIRIT in you, so you need 1John1:9, because -- sigh -- YOU DIDN'T DO YOUR HOMEWORK!

So what value is your own CLAIMS about being Bible-based? NONE. If you won't even look at a channel page prior to ASSuming, then you don't look at Bible, either.

[brainouty]

@GhostFace178 Hint Hint: if you make typos, you've sinned and need 1 John 1:9. Even more so, when you ASSume things about a person absent homework. The Holy Spirit would never be 'in' someone who makes snap judgments. So when you next write me as you just did (but removed it here), first use 1John1:9 and ask GOD. That way, you'll be spared the discipline attendant to Matthew 7:1-5. As it stands, you're in for some discipline: avoid it by using 1John1:9 now.

I live on that verse, btw.

[TFWC88]

Hi What song did you use for your cool video? It's really nice music!

[brainouty]

@TFWC88 It's called 'fnkygvrn' and is a midi file on Win95 machines. So if you have an old computer, you have this on it.

[granddad2002]

Enjoyable. To me, scripture narrates the human condition. The character's in the Bible are us. The cliff's they climb and the tragedies or triumphs that make us think about life. I remember the darkest moment in my life, I was reading 'Job' coincidentally. And I felt that I wasn't alone in my despair. Proverbs put 'sin' and 'sacrifice' into poetry. Isaiah gave me a run at logic. Exodus wasn't like that 'Charleston Heston movie,but insightful on 'Law'. Treat 'angels' as house guest and just live.

[brainouty]

@granddad2002 Well put. :)

[brainouty]

The ramifications are, that you'd be praying to the wrong Person. Christ prays to God the Father, see the Lord's Prayer (which is a guidline,NOT a prayer you pray), and John 17. Now, think: you are part of Him, so you pray as He taught and He did. TO FATHER. Else your prayer is not legal.

And, you pray in HIS Name, as He repeatedly said many times in the Gospels. Because, you are Body of Christ. Your legal standing is In His Person.

Use 1John1:9, too: must be between sins to pray.

[apaton002]

What do you mean by "Satan will try to get the prayer thrown out of court"? I guess what I'm trying to understand is, what are the ramifications of directing my prayers to Christ.