Creation & Evolution Science Seminar / Creacion y Evolucion Seminario y Ciencia / 發展的謊言

To watch the complete video go to:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1672305312852311991

Another Great Video from Dr. Kent Hovind about more reasons why evolution is stupid.

Subject to discuss in this video:

1.- Education or indoctrination? (at 00:14).

2.- Just for evolutionist (at 00:29).

3.- What time does (at 01:23).

4.- Thing to consider for a poor design (at 01:44).

5.- The complexity of the eyeball couldn't happened by blind chance (at 02:18).

6.- Chromosome number (at 04:03).

7.- Ernst Haeckel's Confession (at 05:36).

8.- The appendix is NOT vestigial and why (at 05:51).

9.- Tailbone is NOT vestigial and why (at 06:25).

10.- Chicken evolution (at 07:12).

11.- What really satisfy? (at 07:37).

====================================

Para ver el video completo ir a:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1672305312852311991

Otro Gran Video del Dr. Kent Hovind sobre mas razones del porque la evolución es estúpido.

Temas a discutir en este video:

1.- ¿Educación o adoctrinamiento? (en 00:14).

2.- Solo para evolucionistas (en 00:29).

3.- Que hace el tiempo (en 01:23).

4.- Cosas a considerar para un diseño pobre (en 01:44).

5.- Lo complejo del Globo ocular no pudo haber sido una ciega casualidad (en 02:18).

6.- Numero de Cromosomas (en 04:03).

7.- Confesión de Ernst Haeckel (en 05:36).

8.- El apéndice NO es rudimentario y porque (en 05:51).

9.- La rabadilla NO es rudimentario y porque (en 06:25).

10.- Evolución del Pollo (en 07:12).

11.- ¿Que realmente satisface? (en 07:37).

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Evolution
• tribute
• Stupid
• tributo
• Evolucion
• Richard
• Dawkins
• James
• randi
• Kent
• Hovind
• vestigial
• structures
• kenn
• miller
• 創造和規定動作科學研討會
• Создание
• и
• Семинар
• Науки
• Развития
• Creatie
• Evolutie
• Wetenschap
• Cursus
• La
• création
• le
• Séminaire
• de
• Science
• d'Evolution

[bnejaforever]

si una vez estudiabamos la patela, resulta que antiguamente la gente "los medicos " la " cienca" pensaba que era rudimentario proque no sabia para que servia, (hay muchos otros huesos como este) resulta que aumenta la eficacia mecanica del cuadriceps. y es indispensable para el normal recorrido de la tibia sobre el femur. de otra forma tendriamos un movimiento como articulacion de "muñeco de plastico" en fases de ,como de 90 angulos.

[bnejaforever]

gracias por traducirlo muchas gracias me gustaira escuchar mas de venon fang porque habla muy rapido y no le entienndo todo.

[HushAndLearn]

@gregrutz >>The sand of the Coconino layer is from wind blown sand dumb shit.

--Lol, and how do you think it sediment? Duh!

>>NOT ALL SEDIMENTS ARE FROM WATER !

--Hay, hay, hay. But it needs it in order to solidify.

>>READ A FUCKING GEOLOGY BOOK

--I do, but I also use common sense, logic and reasoning for the sake of impartiality and integrity. I just don't get brainwash because some and some people with a piece of paper say something. Wake up buddy!

[HushAndLearn]

@gregrutz >>Plate tectonics causes earthquakes dummy

--There is not such thing as plate tectonics. All the Pangaea fairy tale is just that...a grown up tale.

The continents are not floating bouncing around, the continents still connected underwater.

Continents do move a bit, but from that to assume they were like that and connected linearly from millions of years, is just silly.

[gregrutz]

@HushAndLearn The sand of the Coconino layer is from wind blown sand dumb shit.

NOT ALL SEDIMENTS ARE FROM WATER !

READ A FUCKING GEOLOGY BOOK

[gregrutz]

@HushAndLearn Plate tectonics causes earthquakes dummy

[HushAndLearn]

@gregrutz >>Look at any picture of the Grand Canyon,  the RIM IS AT 8000 feet asl.on the north side and above 7000 feet on the south rim

--I haven't find it, I don't see how is that against a flood compared to you world view!

>>water does not block fault the land into mountains. Plate Tectonics does, proven in the 1950s.

--You mean earthquakes. Not plate tectonics.

>>River cut the canyon in 5-7 million years

--I know u believe that while I believe a river can do it while layers still fresh

[gregrutz]

@HushAndLearn >>Then the whole area got raised to 8000 feet above sea level

--Show any picture that represent your interpretation

Look at any picture of the Grand Canyon, the RIM IS AT 8000 feet asl. on the north side and above 7000 feet on the south rim.

And water does not block fault the land into mountains. Plate Tectonics does, proven in the 1950s.

The River cut the canyon in 5-7 million years.

[HushAndLearn]

@gregrutz >>HELLO? YOU MISSED THE> Layers were block faulted into mountains [they are tilted], worn flat, & then the Teapeats Sandstone

--Are you kidding? Those are PRECISELY only plausible under water phenomena

>>Then the whole area got raised to 8000 feet above sea level

--Show any picture that represent your interpretation

>>Creationist r always so worried about cutting the canyon in less than 6K years

--I am not, is just that there is no problem with that according to the evidence

[gregrutz]

@HushAndLearn HELLO? YOU MISSED THE>>> Layers were block faulted into mountains [they are tilted], worn flat, and then the Teapeats Sandstone was laid down over the basement layers. Then another 5000 feet of sediments was laid down, some wind blown desert sands, some corals. Then the whole area got raised to 8000 feet above sea level.

Creationist are always so worried about cutting the canyon in less than 6000 years and they don't look at the rocks that are exposed and tell a long history.