Peter Pan-Part 2
Top Comments
All Comments (691)
-
@RLStine001 Yeah, since J.M Barrie wrote this play it's been a tradition for Peter to be played by a girl
-
ammm .. Peter pan is Girl? D:
-
like this if you used to do the shadow puppets when you were little
-
Through out history Peter Pan has been potrayed by a girl. It is a shame how the newer generations need to see peter pan as a boy. The girls do a excellent epic Pan. The only other Panman that I like was played by Robin Williams in Hook. Even still it would have been nice to forever let girls have the experience of playing Peter Pan. All other males suck as Peter. It's time we get back to the girls has Pan!
-
If you birth a boy don't show him movies like this or he'll grow up to be like me. I've been with my bf for 5 years. Nature vs. Nurture? - bah-hahahaha!
-
i thought peter is a BOYS name
-
@rosesandhandgrenades Oh to be young :-)
-
I don't like this version....I grew up on the 1956 version so this is a shock to see Peter played as a girl and have Tink just a light.....o.O
-
.........
I've never seen this version before. The one I grew up with was Disney's Peter Pan, so for me it's a bit weird seeing Peter as a girl because when I think of Peter Pan I think of Bobby Driscoll.
louiselovesmagic 3 months ago 15
So a boy shows up in your room in the middle of the night and all youre worried about is why he's crying?
rosesandhandgrenades 2 months ago 9