History Channel Molten Metal At Ground Zero

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
13,609
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 6, 2007

http://abuse-of-power.org
In this short clip from The History Channel's "World Trade Center, Rise and Fall of an American Icon" Richard Riggs a Debris Removal Specialist that was doing the clean up at ground zero explains how it was still so hot that beams melted and they were pulling out molten Steel.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 15 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @sacr3

    HOLY. FUCKING. SHIT.

    even NIST admits freefall, after David Chandler called them out on it. Even THEY admit it, and yet you refuse to.

    There was freefall. 2.3 seconds of it. EVEN IF the whole interior of the building collapsed before the outer shell fell WITHOUT DAMAGING THE OUTER STRUCTURE AT ALL (Seriously, you buy THAT shit?)

    What was left STILL FELL AT FREEFALL SPEED.

    I'm done with you. someone with their head so far up their own ass will never see anything other than their own shit.

  • I love how every fucking idiot without an argument brings out the conspiracy theorist card! We give you proof and you come back with that bullshit?! You deserve a shit economy, job market, and 10 dollar a gallon gas.

    The question should be "u mad patriot's?", and to that I say fuck yes I am mad. I am mad that the media can brainwash fucking idiots like ZhakoT into thinking steel buildings can be brought down at the speed of gravity by fire!!! Fuckin idiots!

see all

All Comments (216)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MrEmerye Thanks man, I really appreciate it. The media is a truly powerful brainwashing tool. I can only hope that the few of us that are awake can help wake up others before it is too late.

  • @14thSgtStedanko well said... It blows my mind when I state the physics problems with the official story to some. They look at me ,and say "so you think Bush killed 3000 people?" They focus on that, and the amount of people that had to be involved. I understand it is a crazy thought, but We have to eliminate the impossible, then after that. ( No matter how improbable) has to be the answer.

  • Here are the videos that have all the proof

    Heres the proof of explosives

    watch?v=xvw0_i1rGns

    More explosives

    watch?v=V0tzmGgWggg&feature=re­lated

    Firefighters and demolition crew cleaning up fires and molten metal 6 weeks AFTER the incident

    watch?v=t-XA0Rv1Ng8

    The best and Damning compilation of evidence that will bring justice to all in the future

    watch?v=tIx2CVRxRXg

    ^enough evidence to put ANYONE in prison.

  • I suppose blast furnace to melt steel is bullshit all you need is chairs and tables if there was molten steel under the rubble If there was I wasn't there but if I saw that I'd be scratching my head

  • what a crock of bullsh!t

  • Seems to me it takes this thing called O2 to feed fires. Under the rubble I doubt there was so much oxygen the that what organic matter was left could smolder at best not melt steel like a blast furnace. State puppy propagandist this stooge. People are sad in that you tell them the same lie often enough the start to believe it. This guy is a state paid liar.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more