Sandisk SSD v/s HDD
Top Comments
All Comments (14)
-
@mtssvnsn we all know vista suck already
-
i would care to disagree the high RPM drives are no match ... and vista is more graphics heavy and your DESKTOP also might have had a faster processor too... So it might boot faster but can't be compared and that one isn't pathetically slower
-
both r just like my ass
-
I've worked with those newfangled SSD Macs at my student computing support job and if memory serves, they run applications slower than your standard HDD Macs. I doubt any SDD storage product would run audio and visual as fast as a SATA II. Maybe one day they will optimize performance but in actuality, I have my doubts that any current SDD out performs top of the line HDDs in performance. AND COMPARING BOOTUP SPEED IS NOT A RELIABLE PERFORMANCE TEST! Lame marketing gimmick is what it is.
-
Interesting how NONE of the SSD tests show a real world multi-tasking environment.
I have an OCZ SSD 64 and it totally fails, as soon as my PC is doing 2 or more read/write multi tasks I get horrendous lock ups. It is going back to the shop as unfit for purpose.
SSD is a one trick (read speed) pony.
-
Check out OCZ's new "Core" range of SSDs. They're inexpensive.
-
yo prefiero un millon de veces el hdd antes que el sdd el ssd no lo quiero porque si se estropea pierdes toda la informacion!! si es para un pc particular no lo recomiendo, el hdd sigue siendo el mejor si se rompe el hdd siempre se puede recuperar los datos.
the laptop on the right had a clean boot and the one on the left was in hibernation mode. not a really good comparison
fontekk 1 year ago 4
Both are pathetically slow compared to my old WinXP desktop with regular HD
mtssvnsn 2 years ago 2