UCSD Guestbook: Francis Crick

Join UCSD neuroscientist Nick Spitzer as he hosts Nobel Laureate and 1999's Steven W. Kuffler lecturer Francis Crick in a fascinating conversation about Dr.Crick's investigations of human consciousness. Series: "UCSD Guestbook" [4/1999] [Science] [Show ID: 4243]

Category:

Education

Tags:

• neuroscience
• science
• Francis
• Crick
• human

[velocity253]

83 years old in this vid and absolutely still very intellectualy stimulated.....in years to come he will become known as the man who discovered our origin.

[ShroomSamich]

obviously lsd frys ppl's brain's and does not expand consciousness c'mon guys duh he looks challenged he can barely speak and his running around like a mad man! (sarcasm)

[jj987987987]

hellsing piano theme!? sound similar!!! I know not the same....but just sounds similar.

[TheChiinkynoodle]

nothing matters except purpose

[scuzzulus]

a god damn genius

[Angellicationify]

Read the Communist Manifesto,

(Equal obligation of all to work in industrial armies [8th pt. of communist manifesto]) GOOGLE the others, because they are just as devastating.

"Proletarians of all countries, unite!" - Karl Marx & Engel's Manifesto of the Communist Party,1848, at Chp. 9.

watch?v=uD-h25evW3g

:

Workers of the World Unite isn't just a slogan anymore" -Andy Stern

watch?v=WzG0xpkjWrA

:

Allen West 2012

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@aadoza

Please don't explain the protocols to me, I'm well aware of them & I daresay, more than you.

" There is no general scientific consensus with Race and Intelligence."

I wasn't talking about a "scientific consensus with Race and Intelligence."

" Are you intentionally trying to skew things? "

No, but I think we'd better leave it at this. There is a gap of comprehension between us that is clearly unbridgeable...

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@aadoza

" which is why we can look at the work and disregard everything else, results matter."

No idea what you're trying to say here.

" The mechanism for a successful scientific institution is to publish findings."

Thank you, I'm aware scientists tend to publish.

" There are many independent labs working towards the same goal."

So?

" There is a huge peer review process before anything comes remotely close to being called scientific theory."

[aadoza]

@suddenlyitsobvious which is why we can look at the work and disregard everything else, results matter. The mechanism for a successful scientific institution is to publish findings. There are many independent labs working towards the same goal. There is a huge peer review process before anything comes remotely close to being called scientific theory. There is no general scientific consensus with Race and Intelligence. Are you intentionally trying to skew things?

[aadoza]

@suddenlyitsobvious you are absolutely clueless. Books are not only good for burning...

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@aadoza Corruption and agenda's do. ALL OVER THE PLACE. You haven't looked into enough.

Also, it is quite relevant that the entire top of the scientific establishments and all the "foundational fathers" typically had very degenerate beliefs about life, man, race. Of course I'm not saying all of them held the exact same views but there is a clear degenerate pattern.

And of course, what one believes rather tends to influence what one "finds".

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@aadoza

"testable, verifiable results"

Like the "big bang"? The heliocentric MODEL? Relativity? Evolution? Global warming through CO2? etc etc.

Science is ultimately based on beliefs. Furthermore, the scientific process/method you describe is HIGHLY THEORETICAL, and in such purity and practice hardly exists.