John Lear - 911 Remote Controlled Planes & No Plane

John Lear - 911 Remote Controlled Planes & No Plane Discussion

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911

[ThoughtCrime7]

"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth" - Sherlock Holmes (Conan Doyle)

Impossible: A 757 flies 560 MPH at 700 feet altitude.

Improbable: 9/11 was a very well funded inside job and millions were fooled.

Do the math.

[anastasia2657]

To say it is "impossible" for a plane to go at that speed, and to say it is "impossible" for a plane to fly into the WTC without "crashing", without "deceleration", , means you must conclude that it is fake, and this is what people cannot do. They know it's impossible, but they cannot draw the conclusion that the plane is fake, which they must. They will deny the laws of Newton rather than say "it is impossible for a plane to go into the WTC without deceleration & without crashing.

[ThoughtCrime7]

@Thetan1974 John Lear is one of the CORE MEMBERS of Pilots for 9/11 Truth. Re NY, virtually all at P4911T say, maneuvers impossible, speed impossible, impact without recoil impossible. Remote control has the same problems. Most at P4911T say no plane hit the Pentagon, although that was taboo a few years ago. Study of 12,000 eye witnesses (Ace Baker) shows only 8% saw and heard the second plane. Live witnesses on news said small plane, large plane, missile, no plane, no windows, etc.

[ctcole77]

3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?

If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?

How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?

[Thetan1974]

@ThoughtCrime7 Sure, I saw John Lear who also says no planes. And there's no one in the Pilots for 9/11 Truth community to back him up on that idiotic conclusion. To think that there were no planes - and thereby believe that everyone who saw planes are lying and that the planes were all faked on TV - in stead of the obvious Zakheim's remote controlled Boeings theory, is beyond stupidity - nomatter how difficult Lear thinks it would be to RC those planes; he deos not know the secret technology.

[Thetan1974]

@ThoughtCrime7

Excuse me, but you're a retard; I said that the no plane theories were created for the sake of dividing the truth movement and making us look like idiotic conspiracy theorists. I didn't say that the idiots who have FALLEN for those theories - such as yourself - are intelligence agents. Are you too stupid to understand the difference?? Well, that explains why you are a no-planer, doesn't it!

[ThoughtCrime7]

@Thetan1974 First you say all no-planers are intelligence agents, then you say some are dupes. You are not consistent. Did you watch the video of the pilot who flew both of the planes in NY? No response to that?

[Thetan1974]

@ThoughtCrime7

"That would mean that everyone who fav'd September Clues is an intelligence operative.."

As if they couldn't possibly just be people duped into beleiving that BS? Such as yourself?? Get your head straight, please.

[anthonyc31]

@mcRioRemedy busted ... there were 5 videos BOZO. As i said, you are a fucking 9/11 tool. Go fuck yourself.

[Thetan1974]

@ThoughtCrime7

It possible to assume that there were planes - but certainly not standard 767's, of coruse.

It possible to not just assume, but to be AWARE thet the no-plane BS is created with the goal of making the 9/11 truth movement look like nuts and to shift the view away form facts like THESE:

911anomalies. wordpress. com/2007/06/18/south-tower-air­craft-the-evidence-revealed

[cartoonplanes]

@mcRioRemedy Do you really believe a 767 could slice through a steel structured tower "completely" intact?

Do you really believe (as you claim) there a hundred videos of the impact shot from different angles?

Do you believe the "jumpers" could land 60ft from the base of the towers,twice the distance of the current long jump world record with a damn good run-up?

Do you believe everything the media tell you,without hesitation?

Are you a shill or just plain stupid.

[mcRioRemedy]

@anthonyc31 im not worth wasting time on yet you wrote me the same message twice?

how can "i" show you a piece of the plane? talk sense.

i watched your 6 videos. and learned nothing new i didnt already know.

we all know the governments lying about a lot of stuff, no1 ever denied that.

but there are a hundred videos all shot from different angles.

THE PLANES WERE REAL. GET OVER IT, agent provocateur. . .