Atheism: The Stars Are On Our Side.

Your God is too small.

Evidence:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3085885.stm


#1 - Top Favourited (Today) - Education - Global
#7 - Top Favourited (This Week) - Education - Global
#46 - Top Favourited (This Month) - Education - Global
#56 - Top Rated (Today) - Global
#2 - Top Rated (Today) - Education - Global
#6 - Top Rated (This Week) - Education - Global
#38 - Top Rated (This Month) - Education - Global

Category:

Education

Tags:

• deconvert
• deconversion
• apostasy
• god
• religion
• hell
• atheist
• atheism
• atheists
• christianity
• allah
• muslim
• islam
• quran
• koran
• bible
• genesis
• stars
• secular
• humanism
• science

[kukulis100]

7*10^20 < 7*2^80 might be coded with 21 bytes.

And DNA has lots of gigabytes ( billions of bytes) . So amount of possible planets impacts very weakly the possibility of accidental life apearence.

[philhellenes]

@kukulis100 "amount of possible planets impacts very weakly the possibility of accidental life apearence."

Not true. ONE planet with random properties placed in orbit at a RANDOM distance from ONE random star is very VERY unlikely to have conditions suitable for life. BUT, with MANY different planets (different elemental compositions, temperatures, gravity fields, atmospheres etc) at random distances around MANY stars, the right conditions for life become more likely. You're lost in maths.

[philhellenes]

@gENFOOL I thought that was the quote from me you were referring to. :)

Again, you display confirmation bias AND thoughtlessness. I say "creator of some kind" and you hear "God". For instance, naturally evolved intelligences from another universe using technology to create universes are not, cannot be, "gods".

Your definition is cherry-picked. "...most often..."? No. ALWAYS. Gods are by definition ALWAYS supernatural. Gods are not bound by what is naturally possible, for they would not be gods.

[philhellenes]

@gENFOOL There's a psychological thing called "confirmation bias", where we hear or see what we WANT to hear or see. We ALL have it, but the religious mind is riddled with such conclusions. For instance:

"...you know there is a God because you have said it yourself in previous videos..."

I have not said that. I know I have NOT said that for it is NOT what I think. Go back to the vid where you think I said that and listen with more care and concentration.

[SeeledadieKiste]

@philhellenes Whats the music at 9:49?

[TheMadBeach]

Your videos are fantastic! Thank you.

[88rat88]

Superb video!

[BuckyKhronic]

55 ppl failed maths!

[MrImmoli]

@perfectchronic

Atheism is the lack of belief in gods, not belief in no god.

Theism = Belief in god(s).

A = without

Atheism = without belief in gods

Now some atheists may go beyond that and also believe there are no gods, but that would be called something else.

[perfectchronic]

Atheism is simply the belief in no God. For ppl to understand atheism, they need a better (bold) definition of God. I don't like to call what i believe in "God", it's a "supreme force" not understandable to the present day human thought process. I don't worship, i recognize.

[tubebility]

Oooh, I like this! ...subscribed.

[iz2sicc]

@kukulis100 Yea I agree. The omniscient, omnipotent Pink Unicorn unintelligently designed all stuffs.

[kukulis100]

@iz2sicc Anyway I am not against evolution theory, but I do not agree that evolution happened without supreme beeing, as it is not possible in probabilities angle of view.