The Case for INTELLIGENT Evolution pt 1

Perry Marshall explains in clear terms that DNA is clearly designed. It is necessary to suspend your beliefs and approach this subject with open minded skeptism and allow the "information" to come into your mind. You will see that there really is no other explanation. All life was designed.

The question then changes to who designed it? It's a legitimate question that we simply can't answer. But what we can say is that life does have a purpose since we were designed. For more information please visit Perry Marshall's website at

http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Consciousness
• Information
• Theory
• Spiritual
• Meditation
• Origion
• of
• Life
• DNA
• The
• Genetic
• Code
• Perry
• Marshall

[BrazilianGirlDoll]

LOL This Perry Marshall is a joke, and so is his site...he doesn't allow comments on his youtube page (obviously)...another charlatain in our world..SIGH

[vlddas]

The Creator is easily available for comments on what He created and there is a natural process for interaction, which is mutually pleasing (BaktyA mAm aBijAnAti), but you are not using it. The consequence is that you must stay in illusion.

Vedas are the knowledge of God, presented for people, and I would recommend to study them from Hare Krishnas.

Ultimately, all you need, is love, and everything else you can get by your love. Also, the divine knowledge will be gradually revealed.

[tristenmc]

in the proper place of the genome for the fur to be placed in the appropriate area of the animal. For example, a furrier tail isn't going to be much help against the harsher environments. So that 1/64 chance would have to be decreased depending on how large the genome is and where that codon could be best placed for beneficial survival.

So again, what would you hypothesize is the probability of a beneficial copy error mutation?

[tristenmc]

What would you say the probability is of an organism to incur a beneficial copying error mutation? Would you say it's more likely to have a negative or neutral mutation? For example. . .let's say the climate changed, which we know it did many times, if a copy error of one codon could make the difference in an organism (for example, more fur or undercoat) So that's a one in 64 chance that the species will survive. But one would also have to assume that that codon has to be placed . cont.

[Darwinsgift]

If you mean "error correction" as the maintaining of previously "switched off" DNA information that is still present in the genome. In cases of a species being bottlenecked by decreasing numbers and an island race of a few individuals still surviving, these dormant traces do show re-appearance. Although not an area of expertise for me the mutation rates in close relative breeding have been known for centuries perhaps even millenia. Laws preventing this over human history give credence to this!

[Darwinsgift]

The DNA capability to eat the new plant would already be in place as a mutation. My own inability to eat fruit proves this can happen! The other changes would come from the caterpillar's ability to blend in with the new plant, say the darker ones falling prey to birds and lighter ones blending in which leads to selective breeding! The DNA follows the parents and nature does the selecting with each subsequent generation. The original moths will continue comparitavely unchanged.

[tristenmc]

Also, if random mutation is good for species to evolve. . .why is there so much error correction mechanisms built into DNA to stop it from "evolving". Does that make sense?

[tristenmc]

Using your analogy, it wasn't an error in the DNA that caused the caterpillar to be forced into a different environment. . .but the different environment would force the caterpillar to adjust or die. Now this change in environment would cause their DNA to change drastically enough to be uncompatible to mate with the origional species (Assuming that the caterpillar would grow to a moth and place it's prodigy on the same "wrong" plant). Is that not logical or am I missing something?

[Darwinsgift]

It is possible for comparitavely fast speciation. If a moth that relies on a particular food plant for its caterpillar should lay eggs on the wrong one then the caterpillar resulting will imprint the new plant for its young. Within a few generations small changes can appear that stops breeding between the two previously identical species forming a sub species.

[tristenmc]

What's your thoughts on the difference in the randomness of the mutations from what happens in copying errors from that of radiation?

Also, you mentioned previously that we were able to separate fruit fly species by differing their food supply. So one would assume that it can be done sooner than millions of years. . .so what's your thoughts on that?