MONEY (1962) by the Beatles with Pete Best
Top Comments
All Comments (203)
-
There's no argument vis a vis Best vs. Starr... just as there can be no argument that H2-0 is water, CO-2 carbon dioxide or CO-1 is carbon monoxide... It's chemistry.
-
wow this was the month before i was born!
-
That is some rocking singing. He gets nasty! We'll never know what the later Beatles would have been with Pete. Lucky for him the Anthology Albums pointed some deserved earnings his way. Took long enough, tho. But what a raw sample of the early Beatles.
-
The drumming is terrible
-
@MrPJ1954 Yes, that was my point, exactly.
-
I feel bad for Pete. He did carry the guys to the point where they got into EMI and auditioned. Didn't all of Liverpool riot in the streets, turning over cars and setting fires when the people learned of Pete being 'fired'? I heard or read that somewhere a while back. I mean for all of Lennon's insolence, couldn't he have told Martin: "Listen George, we're a band, and we won't carry on without our Mate. We know Ringo, but was Pete ever really given a fair shot?
-
Regardless of whether or not Pete needed to go, The Beatles definitely did him wrong. Brian Epstein was tasked by The Beatles to "do the dirty work" of firing Pete.
Allegedly, Epstein put it this way: "Pete, I have some bad news for you. The boys want you out and it's already been arranged that Ringo will join the band on Saturday."
-
@Merti63 TheLive at The Star Club recordings were actually done in December 1962 which was after The Beatles signed their record contract with Parlophone Records. Ringo Starr was definitely featured on drums.
If this is Pete Best then George Martin was right. He was weak on the drums. Ringo made a huge difference.
Appleholic1 3 months ago 16
@TheFernseher09 Actually, Ringo is playing on the Live in Hamburg recordings. Those tapes were recorded in december of 1962, 4 months after Ringo joined the band.
Merti63 3 months ago 7