2 & 3) her universal healthcare plan is not like what i would consider to be ideal universal healthcare plan, she does not plan to have her healthcare system ran through taxes that is why she discuses an enforcement mechanism in this video /watch?v=e18Qa56tMBU the plan forces everyone who doesn't have insurance to pay in the system an equal amount, even the poor who cannot afford it.
I support universal heathcare but you need to look at the specifics of her plan.
2) To say we cant have universal health care because the poor wont be able to afford it is like saying we shouldnt have public education for the same reason.
3) If it is done through taxes, there is no need for a new enforcment mechanism.
btw, the 15 million americans estimate is considered an underestimate by most economists.
3.) Hillary does not yet have a plan on how she will implement her inforcement mechanism anyway.
Although I support universal healthcare hillary's healthcare plan is a fiscal disaster and because of that does not have a prayer of making it through congress.
btw, most economists believe the 15 million americans esitmate is an inflated statistic.
1.) we dont pay taxes on the war right now, bush is not counting the iraq and afghanistran war spending because it is being considered emergency spending
2.) even if we could pull off a sufficient tax cut for the middle class that does not mean everyone who recieves the tax break will be able to afford the single payer program that hillary would make manditory if you don't have insurance.
Nonsense. By creating universal health care you are "giving red meat" (watever that means) to people that dont want us to have universal health care??? That makes absolutely no sense.
Yes but by making it manditory to pay into the program you are also giving red meat to congressional powers that don't want us to have universal healthcare.
Single payer program is a great idea. And nobody, that doesnt already pay taxes, will be unable to afford it. All we really need to do is divert the tax money that is currently going to the war in Iraq and have employers subsidize the tax.
There are already universal health care models all around the world. Just take Canada or many other european countries for example. We dont have to reinvent the wheel. We already know what works.
The difference between hillary's and obama's healthcare plans is hillary's plan makes you pay into the single payer program even if you can't afford it, Obama's healthcare plan is not only better than hillay's it also has a higher chance of making it through congress.
Sabotage is a difficulty.
Renuzithatesyou 3 years ago
"even the poor who cannot afford it."
Thats just false.
kubush 3 years ago
1) debt
2 & 3) her universal healthcare plan is not like what i would consider to be ideal universal healthcare plan, she does not plan to have her healthcare system ran through taxes that is why she discuses an enforcement mechanism in this video /watch?v=e18Qa56tMBU the plan forces everyone who doesn't have insurance to pay in the system an equal amount, even the poor who cannot afford it.
I support universal heathcare but you need to look at the specifics of her plan.
jonathanwindham 3 years ago
1) Where do you think the war funding comes from?
2) To say we cant have universal health care because the poor wont be able to afford it is like saying we shouldnt have public education for the same reason.
3) If it is done through taxes, there is no need for a new enforcment mechanism.
btw, the 15 million americans estimate is considered an underestimate by most economists.
kubush 3 years ago
(continued)
3.) Hillary does not yet have a plan on how she will implement her inforcement mechanism anyway.
Although I support universal healthcare hillary's healthcare plan is a fiscal disaster and because of that does not have a prayer of making it through congress.
btw, most economists believe the 15 million americans esitmate is an inflated statistic.
jonathanwindham 3 years ago
1.) we dont pay taxes on the war right now, bush is not counting the iraq and afghanistran war spending because it is being considered emergency spending
2.) even if we could pull off a sufficient tax cut for the middle class that does not mean everyone who recieves the tax break will be able to afford the single payer program that hillary would make manditory if you don't have insurance.
(continued)
jonathanwindham 3 years ago
Nonsense. By creating universal health care you are "giving red meat" (watever that means) to people that dont want us to have universal health care??? That makes absolutely no sense.
kubush 3 years ago
Yes but by making it manditory to pay into the program you are also giving red meat to congressional powers that don't want us to have universal healthcare.
jonathanwindham 3 years ago
Single payer program is a great idea. And nobody, that doesnt already pay taxes, will be unable to afford it. All we really need to do is divert the tax money that is currently going to the war in Iraq and have employers subsidize the tax.
There are already universal health care models all around the world. Just take Canada or many other european countries for example. We dont have to reinvent the wheel. We already know what works.
kubush 3 years ago
The difference between hillary's and obama's healthcare plans is hillary's plan makes you pay into the single payer program even if you can't afford it, Obama's healthcare plan is not only better than hillay's it also has a higher chance of making it through congress.
jonathanwindham 3 years ago