True News 15: Statism is Dead - Part 5 - Terrorism, 9/11 and Politics

Freedomain Radio - http://www.freedomainradio.com - text of video: http://www.fdrurl.com/statism5 - List of US deaths: http://tinyurl.com/statism-6

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• 911
• Terrorism
• conspiracy
• Ron Paul
• Freedomain Radio
• statism
• objectivism
• libertarian

[MrEpicTruth]

I've always been of the opinion that this is one of your crowning works, Mr. Molyneux. It is daring and powerful, yet empirical and objective.

Don't stop. Don't ever stop, don't give in to their threats. We CAN prevail. Unforeseen events in the Middle East are making our Mafia Dons quite uneasy. A golden opportunity is beginning to emerge and it must be grasped. Truth will always remain, regardless of the lies the Dons use to cover it up and distract you from it.

[stefbot]

@MrEpicTruth thank you thank you

[annalenacrying]

love returning here, thnx Stef !!

[brianmo180]

I wish the founders of this country had gone all the way in eliminating government.

[09jake12]

@PluralOfEverything You almost had him. Statists are pretty slippery. lol

[annalenacrying]

Stef, if you could vote (..being a Canadian you can´t, unless you have clever ways to bypass the system..).. whom would you vote for the next President of the Land of the American Dream... I found a mindblowing video, man I want this to happen ((RP 2012)) for the sake of us ALL not just the U.S. citizens.. ´´Ron Paul: The 45th President of the United States``..must see.. watch?v=kAulpWLZC2Y

[DrFuckingPepper]

I've been watching the world die since I was young.

Now Australia, my home, is dying, too.

Treat people as your equal. Deny those who would have you bow down their pleasure. Even if they fine you. Tear up the paper.

You are free.

[boulaajaj]

I totally agree with this! But where do we start? Can you put up a video explaining that?

[PluralOfEverything]

@eukota Technically, you're arguing that congress and the courts have the authority to decide that it is immoral to not want to pay taxes. My question was: "And who decides, in the case of taxation, whose sense of morality is debased?" Your answer was the general consensus among people in congress. It was a funny answer considering the fact that you're trying to make a case for morality not being decided by a majority.

[eukota]

@PluralOfEverything Agreed. But I was arguing that the government is not just a "majority opinion". Only the House of Reps is population-based. There is also the president, the senate, and the courts. All of this is to attempt to get the best mileage out of any legislation. Your statement was still meant to obfuscate what I stated. Would prefer to think more but have to run. More later.

[PluralOfEverything]

@eukota Congress is a group of people. I am not a member of congress, so nobody in congress is me. I added the "me" part to my summary of what you said to indicate that I don't care what their majority decision is any more than I care about the majority of u.s. citizens' opinions. The majority opinion of any group does not dictate whether or not the opinion that taxation is immoral is based on debased morality.

[eukota]

@PluralOfEverything Your summary did not match what I said. It was an incorrect interpretation of my argument.