Villeneuve vs Schumacher

http://simracing.hu

A great fight between Michael Schumacher and Jacques Villeneuve for the 1997 Formula 1 World championship title

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Jacques Villeneuve
• villeneuve
• jerez 1997

[74788577363]

@TommyBellingham  NO Prost did that to senna in 1989 to win the title yet senna still one the race but was disqualified and had the title taken from him. So senna's crash with Prost in 1990 was only fair.

[DBDMotorsports]

@TheMagnatar actually if you look, MS saw him, turned to the left to avaoid hitting him at first, then turned into him.

[tool5150]

MS is just a pile of you know what. this was not the first or last time has done something like that 

[deloford]

I was there... on that very corner! I can tell you the whole crowd were booing MS, we could tell immediately that he tried to take Villeneuve out. It was also Hakkinen's first race win, so I am doubly proud to have been at that corner in 1997.

[pisomark]

@PsilocybeBRA ahaha.....senna have to win both suzuka and last race on adelaide to win the title (at adelaide on the rain senna shunt on the back of martin brundle car, by the way)

discharge a result???? actually they have to discharge 4 RESULT!!! foolish rule!!!

did you know that prost make more total points than senna also in 1988?? but he had di discharge 4 fuccking results!!

usual taleban senna fan!!!!!

[91debaser]

@PsilocybeBRA You are quite simply wrong, go look it up. Even if Senna had not been disqualified he still would have been behind Prost (7 points to be exact) with one race left (in which they both failed to finish). In 1989 only the 11 best scores counted, which might be where your discarding one result rubbish might be coming from.

Might want to check your facts before you start slagging people off.

[PsilocybeBRA]

@91debaser dont talk shit

in 89 with prost DNF at suzuka and senna winning, senna would be the wc

you could discard one result of the season

[91debaser]

@74788577363 WRONG. The title was not taken from Senna in 89, the race win was. If Senna had kept the win he would have been 7 points behind Prost needIing to win in Adelaide with a Prost DNF. Both drivers DNF so Prost would still have been champion. Senna (2010) was unfair to Prost about this.

Senna was a great driver, but a bully on track, Prost had enough of his antics (Estoril 88, Imola 89) and did not yield. What Senna did in 1990 was despicable, he could have killed them both very easily.

[pisomark]

@AlejjSi yes...shit is shit!

[TRAXXAS58]

I normally defend Schumacher but sometimes he takes it too far. Schumacher clearly turns in on him like he always does. He expects others to give in and takes his line and causes accidents when they could be avoided.

[bobilator1]

Schummy is a cheater and he have been caught many time so ....

[corytan5]

villeneuve clearly braked too late for the corner and couldn't or didn't want to turn in. Schumacher's double move was because he saw villeneuve and backed off first, then he had to turn in, expecting villeneuve to turn as well, but villeneuve went straight.