ABC Vs. Loose Change Part I

At the Treason in America Conference on 3/6/2010, ABC News decided to drop by and "cover" the event.

• Category

  Entertainment

[xClown55]

we debating for a pretty long time, ive shown u the facts i got and in the end u contradicted urself so hard by the sources u believe in. the sources u believe in showed that the towers fell at freefall speed, which is not possible. and now u r in denial. and thats the reason i call u a sheeple. sources he believes in shows that it was a freefall -> still believes media. guess im done here, no matter how long we'll debate u wont change ur mindset even if its clear as day. hf with ur facts sheep

[Sharky2055]

You might believe you've the facts, but I'm betting you don't.

[xClown55]

no it doesnt make sense because i looked at the facts... not the other way around lol

[Sharky2055]

It listed sideways because that is where the fires began, its where steel lost its cohesion and steel gave way first. The original report makes sense once you consider its facts.

[Sharky2055]

I deleted it because I left out an important word. It did weakened them because fire was on several floors.

[xClown55]

But its not like i come to the conclusion that its a conspiracy theory the moment it happened, its just that the ''conspiracy theorists'' make more sense that the original report does... if u got some sources that tells me otherwise pls do so. But dont show me the pancake story, cause like i told u, one of the buildings top part fell sideways, so that cant be the case...

[xClown55]

i see that u deleted your comment, do u want me to proceed with it, or did you realise that what uve said is a bit stupid? its not that i like to chose whatever is says,its that if it were reliable it would mean that it suggest one of the towers fell at freefall, a plane that hit the 93th floor that caused a fire that shouldnt even have weakened 10 floors making a tower of 110 storys high fall at free fall speed.

[xClown55]

vincentdunn. com/wtc. html

says : ''The entire one hundred and ten-story building collapsed in 8 seconds''

tms. org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eag­­ar/Eagar-0112. html

says : ''If it had been free fall, with no restraint, the collapse would have only taken eight seconds''

They are sourced you rely on, so it's not an IF story. Unless you want to tell me that those 2 sources you shared arent reliable, eventhough u r the one thats been sharing them with me. dont tell me u will deny this too now lol