@baby13sc Our country didn't know what to do. Truthers fail to see that our government is human and prone to mistakes and collective human emotions, like shock. Our government doesn't have as much power as people think they do. I mean, if they did, then how did a friggin' security guard take down the entire presidency in Watergate? Hate to bring up unrelated topics, but have to.
either my computer/internet/youtube's fucked, or your youtube channel is absolutely unavailable and you just posted that comment a week ago. so, for whoever agrees with your 'guess', read my question and try to answer it with another reasonable 'guess'
try to use your logic for this. if they were 'unaware' of how many hijacked planes, or of their destinations, why would they allow bush to stay in the school that could've been a target, killing those kids. shouldn't they have put the children's safety a top priority rather than worrying if the room of kids will freak out? meaning, how did they not know if the president was a target or not? shouldn't that have been a priority to get him to safety asap as well?
God, all you fucking idiots posting on here can die IN A MOTHER FUCKING FIRE. 9/11 is a fraud, and I'm fucking sick of you douchebags that believe the lies.
@nedgey My guess is that he didn't want to freak out a room of seven year olds. We forget that Bush is human and obviously prone to mistakes. I mean, after Pearl Harbor, FDR stood around with a blank stare on his face for close to 20 minutes before doing anything. They're humans and have human emotions, too. Loose Change wants you to think on the contrary.
I have heard all these questions before. the question to ask is what does the ABC guy think ? I don't think you could get an honest answer but for his job's sake, he believes the official story.
what I would ask that knucklehead is "what would it take to convince him that the official story is crap?" -
This Nano Thermite "evidence" is just more unsupported conclusions and really bad science . Just another example of the "Truth" movement doing what it does best, SPECULATE.
The speculation game is easy, I speculate that the so called Nano Thermite was merely rust inhibiting primer paint with a Kaolinite base.
@baby13sc Our country didn't know what to do. Truthers fail to see that our government is human and prone to mistakes and collective human emotions, like shock. Our government doesn't have as much power as people think they do. I mean, if they did, then how did a friggin' security guard take down the entire presidency in Watergate? Hate to bring up unrelated topics, but have to.
brassbonanza97 1 week ago
@brassbonanza97
either my computer/internet/youtube's fucked, or your youtube channel is absolutely unavailable and you just posted that comment a week ago. so, for whoever agrees with your 'guess', read my question and try to answer it with another reasonable 'guess'
baby13sc 1 week ago
@brassbonanza97
try to use your logic for this. if they were 'unaware' of how many hijacked planes, or of their destinations, why would they allow bush to stay in the school that could've been a target, killing those kids. shouldn't they have put the children's safety a top priority rather than worrying if the room of kids will freak out? meaning, how did they not know if the president was a target or not? shouldn't that have been a priority to get him to safety asap as well?
baby13sc 1 week ago
God, all you fucking idiots posting on here can die IN A MOTHER FUCKING FIRE. 9/11 is a fraud, and I'm fucking sick of you douchebags that believe the lies.
tooniverse 1 week ago
nice soul patch dbag
TheOrono22 2 weeks ago
@nedgey My guess is that he didn't want to freak out a room of seven year olds. We forget that Bush is human and obviously prone to mistakes. I mean, after Pearl Harbor, FDR stood around with a blank stare on his face for close to 20 minutes before doing anything. They're humans and have human emotions, too. Loose Change wants you to think on the contrary.
brassbonanza97 2 weeks ago
Is there an official explanation as to why Bush was allowed to stay at the primary school rather than be taken immediately to a secure location?
Or an explanation as to why the NYC rubble and wreckage wasn't stored at a secure location for ongoing analysis?
I'm new to this line of enquiry but can't find a decent website answering some of the questions these guys raise.
nedgey 4 weeks ago
I have heard all these questions before. the question to ask is what does the ABC guy think ? I don't think you could get an honest answer but for his job's sake, he believes the official story.
what I would ask that knucklehead is "what would it take to convince him that the official story is crap?" -
heidegger101 1 month ago
This Nano Thermite "evidence" is just more unsupported conclusions and really bad science . Just another example of the "Truth" movement doing what it does best, SPECULATE.
The speculation game is easy, I speculate that the so called Nano Thermite was merely rust inhibiting primer paint with a Kaolinite base.
CCRider100 1 month ago
Avery: We believe there were highjackers
Great to hear Dylan, I look forward to seeing this update in Loose Change - Todays Edition
CCRider100 1 month ago