Camera Trap 2 :BIRMINGHAM SPEED : BRISTOL RD ACCIDENT

This classic TRAP disrupts traffic and causes accidents. http://www.birminghammail.net/news/birmingham-news/2006/10/03/rush-hour-car-c... ) NO details were in the media as the trial and inquest were held in secret. Road surveys show 40mph here as the typical speed (causing no harm) BUT the camera catches the small number who forget to brake as they pass the camera.NOTHING to do with road safety and no safety benefits.The Chief Constable, Sir Paul Scott-Lee,AVOIDED implementing the DfT Guidelines on signage and visibility at many sites because they were only best practices (not legal requirements)..They even PLANTED A TREE in front of the camera to conceal it further,but CO-INCIDENTLY since the site has been displayed on YouTube the tree has been cut down.It can still be seen on Google streetview. The Chief Constable has taken retirement and will escape being called to account.A clever but ignoble strategy.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Bristol
• Road
• Paul
• Scott-Lee
• police
• gatso
• BIRMINGHAM
• SPEED
• U.K
• CAMERA
• PARTNERSHIP
• corruption

[kmacpahrump]

I'd like my 51 seconds back please.

[Speshboy]

@denny174 I refer you to my earlier posts. It's all covered there.

[denny174]

Speshboy, I thought you had gone away when you would not answer my last question, because you don`t like the truth.PLEASE remind me, did not the police road markings at the scene of the accident involving Abigail Craen indicate that she had stepped out about ONE metre AHEAD of the crossing.The answer is very important, but you can`t face it.

[denny174]

Speshby, it has been a pleasure dealing with you. It is so interesting to see how you cannot bring yourself to answer the IMPORTANT question, if the impact point really was AHEAD of the crossing.Because no one can face the truth, no improvements have been made.That is why I have a grievance with irresponsible Authorities.If I get a chance I will post further clips to try to explain more.Thank you for your point of view, it helps explain a few things.

[Speshboy]

Read my first post from this morning and you'll understand why 1m is irrelevant, and why I don't need to say anything else. If you can't work it out for yourself then so be it.

[denny174]

Before you back off, having realised you only know the published version, please advise if you agree Abigail was hit 1 metre BEFORE the crossing point.You either agree or disagree, opting out is not an option, and if you agree please explain how this fits your theory.If you don`t agree I will find a way of posting more evidence.RSVP.

[Speshboy]

Oh, and seeing as logic isn't something that you display on here, I can understand why the police aren't interested in your biased witterings. You got done by a speed camera because you were driving dangerously. Get over yourself.

I've said what needs to be. Thank you very much for giving the opportunity on here for it to be shown why speed cameras are successful, and why the only arguments against them come from angry internet posters who have been caught out by them. Examine your motives.

[Speshboy]

The light was red for anything up to 8 seconds as the driver approached, at least a third over the speed limit. Despite this he failed to slow down and killed the student.

[denny174]

JUST explain why the IMPACT point ( marked in yellow on the road) was about one metre IN FRONT of the crossing, adjacent to the GAP between the traffic lights and the tree.I have taken photographic evidence, as presented to the original judge.LOGICALLY this implies ABIGAIL stepped out through the gap, allowable by the FAILURE to install a safety rail subsequent to the previous accident. I DARE YOU to sensibly explain this point which was kept out of the media.Let`s see how clever you are.

[Speshboy]

You're paranoid. The police are not interested in this kind of confused, poorly researched and misinterpreted nonsense.

40mph minimum speed on a 30mph road. The girl ended up 30m up the road. No skid marks or any sign of braking. The killer said that he didn't see the red light or the girl on the road. He said that he didn't stop because he had no insurance.

Abigail Craen was killed by an inattentive, uninsured, dangerous, speeding driver. Nothing else. She was not killed by a tree.