Since I made the "Most Important Image" video, I have consistently gotten emails asking how the image was taken in the first place.
Here is a video from HubbleSite.org that does a great job of tel...
Since I made the "Most Important Image" video, I have consistently gotten emails asking how the image was taken in the first place.
Here is a video from HubbleSite.org that does a great job of telling the story of how the first Hubble Deep Field was taken in 1995.
What many people don't know is that the decision to try and take this image was very risky for the project scientists. Time on the Hubble telescope is in very high demand and very competitive and using it to stare at an empty patch of sky was considered a waste, especially if nothing turned up.
It was far from clear that the telescope would see anything at all after such long exposures. The risk paid off however, and the rest is history.
CREDIT: NASA and STSci (created under NASA contract and is public domain)
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
At this moment across the other side of the universe other beings may be viewing the stars that died to gave us our heavy elements. But will they have Pink Floyd?
We will alwasy be seeing stars. That what causes the expansion is due to dark matter. Which only if not mostly exists between galaxys. Dark matter is like antigravity but honestly thats just the only way to describe it.
Positive non anti gravity is what we experience inside a galaxy, a galaxy is like a gravitational storm of stars that will go on forever.
And if the expansion in indeed accelerating, our fate is pretty grim. A couple of billion years from now, we won't be seeing a thing in the sky. Anywhere... Nothing... For eternity... On our way to the big freeze or big rip, whichever comes first.
I know it's a bit of a cliche, but it's a pretty dreadful perspective.
But since other things will get us, as a species, much sooner, there's really no point in worrying about that at this time :P
It's fascinating!! But i have one doubt: If the ultra deep field picture that was taken it's 47 billion light years far away, how the universe is 13 billions years old, if nothing is faster than light? I mean, how those galaxies are 47 billion light years distant if the edge of the universe couldn't be farthest than 13 billion years? How?
Guda, it's because the fabric of spacetime expands faster than the speed of light. At least that's what the redshift of the most distant galaxies in the visible universe indicates.
Some of the farthest objects in the Universe will never be visible to us, since light can't match the speed at which the source distances itself from us and will never be able to travel the required distance.
so Tomkaten, are you basically saying that the galaxies were 13B LY away when the photons left (the photons which we're seeing now) and that, after all this time, now they are 47B LY away?
"The age of the Universe is about 13.7 billion years, but due to the expansion of space we are now observing objects that are now considerably farther away than a static 13.7 billion light-years distance. The edge of the observable universe is now located about 46.5 billion light-years away".
All a bit beyond human comprehension, I know, since we're used to much smaller scales. It's the expansion that's making it hard to process.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
We will alwasy be seeing stars. That what causes the expansion is due to dark matter. Which only if not mostly exists between galaxys. Dark matter is like antigravity but honestly thats just the only way to describe it.
Positive non anti gravity is what we experience inside a galaxy, a galaxy is like a gravitational storm of stars that will go on forever.
I know it's a bit of a cliche, but it's a pretty dreadful perspective.
But since other things will get us, as a species, much sooner, there's really no point in worrying about that at this time :P
But i have one doubt:
If the ultra deep field picture that was taken it's 47 billion light years far away, how the universe is 13 billions years old, if nothing is faster than light?
I mean, how those galaxies are 47 billion light years distant if the edge of the universe couldn't be farthest than 13 billion years?
How?
Some of the farthest objects in the Universe will never be visible to us, since light can't match the speed at which the source distances itself from us and will never be able to travel the required distance.
"The age of the Universe is about 13.7 billion years, but due to the expansion of space we are now observing objects that are now considerably farther away than a static 13.7 billion light-years distance. The edge of the observable universe is now located about 46.5 billion light-years away".
All a bit beyond human comprehension, I know, since we're used to much smaller scales. It's the expansion that's making it hard to process.