Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Why radiocarbon of Egyptian mummies is controversial

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
30,509
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 30, 2008

Radiocarbon of Egyptian artefacts shows serious contradictions. We shall once again consider the alleged reliability of the radiocarbon method used for supporting the traditional version of the "ancient" history, particularly Egyptian, as reflected in a fundamental and detailed article published by the Manchester Museum in England in 1979 as part of the project named "The Mummies of the Manchester Museum".The radiocarbon dating of the mummy from the Manchester Museum collection attributed the mummy's bones to 1000 b.c., whereas the cloth that the mummy has been wrapped in received the dating of 380 a.d. The discrepancy between the datings of the mummy and the cloth equals some 1400 years, although the dates should be equal. The cloth may be somewhat older than the mummy if an old cloth had been used by the embalmers, but it couldn't possibly have belonged to a later age.

Category:

Travel & Events

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (234)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @AFRICA4AFRICANS you are right

  • @VendPrekmurec RIGHT ON PIONT THEY STOLED THE STORY OF THUMOSES DRIVING THE HKYSOS

    HERE IS A BIGGER THEY CLAIM THEY LEFT IN EGPYT IN A MASS EXODUS THEN WENT TO CANAAN BUT CANAAN WAS A EGPYTIAN COLONLY!!!..LOL

  • The mummy & much younger linnen are a mystery.The Turin shroud has been exposed to fire which makes radio carbon dating problematic.It's face( Jesus ??) can be seen in stone in Alexandria & is before Christ.(source:Steve Henry ) History is much more fraudulent then I assumed & if we don't know the past we're surely gonna repeat it ! We gotta do our homework so that we know when we are manipulated into belief,instead of being helped to think more clearly.I don't know enough about Fomenko POV. Bye

  • why Chris's shroud from Turine was radio carbon dated in 11 or 13. century AD does not surprise me, because 1. Torah (BIBLE) was written 1100 AD (known as Leningrad Codex)...

    So the whole Western history is probably jewish hoax (including their "Moses" as "pharaoh")

  • hahaha, if you wanst an ABURRIDISIMO ka0ssis the Imposter, then you wouldn't want to impersonate the innocent and sexually abuse children, WOULD YOU PAEDOPHILES INFIDEL!, MUAHAHAHAHAAA! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA! MUAHAHAHAAHAHA!

  • @KaOssis Do you think I'm bored or something? Quit writing shit to me, I'm never going to read it.

  • Hahaha, well you got it all over your imposter channel ka0ssis, haaha, look's like you don't know how to save your sinful ass on the original Rosslyn Winding Apprentice Pillar of Chiverlry then, hahahah, what a pathetic infidel you are, hahahaha!

  • @KaOssis Lol! I'm not reading that shit either.

  • Arrh, wada mada ka0ssis, havn't you got a spinal rod to wrap your girdle roundabout the Earth's Ley Line Grid to catch up with your sinfull ass before it catches up with you, hahahaha... so be it!

  • @KaOssis What? I'm not reading all that shit.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more