Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Facts about PC vs Consoles

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
800 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 30, 2009

Facts about PC gaming and console gaming.

Category:

Gaming

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (snbkk2c)

  • Some may not agree but I don't wanna get insulted so just get the one you like. I have a i7 950 and I'm very satisfied with it but I prefer the console for games.

  • @Pay2play4aday

    hard to believe this...

  • Who gives a fuck about 30+ fps. From 24 fps human eye can see without any distorsion/lag. 30 is good for sumthing so little and so portable and so comfortable. And graphics, who cares about them. Do you watch your enemy eye when you shoot his head. Get an i3 + a ps3+ a netbook and you're done with everyting. Keep the i3 until it cannot run programs or what you work on. Netbook for presentations and exams and console for gaming and nothing else.

  • @Pay2play4aday

    Do you realize that from 60fps to 30fps is a night to day difference? 60fps is a key element for better gameplay.

  • @snbkk2c Yup, my i7 can process it but if there are only 25 servers... *cough* Crysis 2 *cough* and on my ps3 there are alot more why would I choose pc? To play with who? 37k gamers?

  • @Pay2play4aday 25 servers? LOL I played yesterday Crysis 2 MP and I saw about 1000 servers. So you are saying that you play Crysis 2 on ps3? LOL LOL LOL good lack try to play with 1152 x 720, 25-30fps, low-medium settings, small FOV, controler, etc On the other hand I play Crysis 2 with 1920x1200, 60fps, max settings, large FOV, K/M. night and day differences...

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (61)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Pay2play4aday 24 fps has no lag? Okay, for example, i took portal 2. I used fps_max 24 and the FPS was limited to 24. Oh my fucking god what shitty lag. 60 FPS or higher is the best. Actually it doesnt matter if you have higher fps than 60, since usually refresh rate of screens is 60.

  • @bastmode882 thats why pc gaming is better. there are only pros. no cons at all.

  • well said

  • pc r better but they cost more and you have to upgrade like once every 2 years.

  • All you did was show pros for the pc

  • @Timster480 I hate to agree, but you are right there. If more games took advantage of dual, quad, and hexa-core processors then It would be a grand day. I know that Optifine can make Minecraft run on more than one core, substantially increasing FPS and decreasing chunk loading times with fewer lag spikes.

  • Someone who sees the facts, finally! Snbkk2c you a legend :)

  • @Pay2play4aday good to know you have an i7 at 3ghz per core,while you get 6ghz of that in a game,my 4 core gets 6.4ghz,more cores doesn't mean better you dumbass

    more cores = less cpu per core = for development

    less cores = more cpu per core = for gaming

    few games use more than 2 cores

  • @snbkk2c not to go against you,i'm on the pc side here,but crysis 2 is just hilariously easy to run...i could run it with my 9800 gt at max settings

  • @Pay2play4aday the problem is you are playing shit games,you see,the pc gaming community does not exactly enjoy shit games,which is is why VERY little people play crysis 2,have you ever even fucking played the first you idiot? crysis 2 = 1 step forward for console gaming,2 steps backward for pc gaming

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more