Part One Shorter - Continuos Pieces 911 - Jeff Hill - Pumpitout

All at: http://tinyurl.com/choa5x

From the 80's: "The other example to consider is the "stealth" program. This is a multi-faceted program, which actually involves not only aircraft but also a highly secret category of naval warships with their own special bases (known since) the spring of 1982, (when) they spawned naval warfare in the Southern Hemisphere (Falklands War). Restricting attention to the stealth aircraft program, the most radical and promising development is that of the "phantom warplane", (equipped with a) superconducting electromagnetic field which can bend light waves. Built into an aircraft, this equipment creates a zone around the aircraft which light cannot penetrate: instead, it flows around and onward, like water around a boulder in a stream. The result is that at a distance the airplane is invisible, not only to radar, but even to the eye. Public comments about the stealth program refer only to radar evasion, not to the far more startling capability of optical invisibility. Once again, this is done in order to limit discussion to a range of weaponry capabilities which will not raise too many public eyebrows. If the full capabilities of the phantom warplane were known, it would raise the question: why is something so radical needed? The answer lies with Russia's still-secret beam weapons. The most important fact about the invisibility field of a phantom warplane is not the invisibility itself, but the protection which the same field provides against all types of beam weapons."
http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/docs/all/dbeye.html

Posting at pumpitout.com : 1- Preliminary review on the Gulfstream C-20, a.k.a. "Venus 22" on 9/11 (aircraft flying during the "Pentagon's attack" appart of the E-4B, the C-130, military choppers, military orbs, etc...): http://www.geocities.com/chrisbornag/gulfstream.htm

'Brief' for the busy ones: The important thing here is that Mark Howard Gaffney removed his C-20 Gulfstream (Venus 22) entry from his blog. Of that C-20 Gulfstream that was flying with the same trajectory & timing of 'the missile' that hit the Pentagon on 9/11. The reason for the removal of Gaffney's entry seems to be that John Farmer told him to do so. Is John Farmer 'deflating' the subject by higher orders? You can see by yourself the last posting on the subject by John Farmer (a.k.a '911files') at that infamous Randi forum: On 31st March 2009, 10:49 PM 911files replied: "...it was VENUS77 [E-4B flying over Pentagon] you were thinking of as well. VENUS22 was a Gulfstream [C-20]. Of course we have identified two other E4B's active that day as well, WORD31 headed west out of Andrews after the attack and VIVI36 trying to get out of Wright Patt to JFK but was denied clearance." http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?p=4572992
So, the C-20 Gulfstream, Venus22 was captured on video... and aired by the international TV, but NOT in the U.S.; however, it seems that that subject is going to continue under brackets for still a longer time... To see the C-20 Gulfstream footage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1KhSqArVyg
To see the C-20 Gulfstream footage as aired by ABC Spain (in Spanish): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYkj93HHqYs
That Gulfstream C-20 seems to have been seen at the Pentagon at the moment of the attack by Samuel Danner.
http://www.apfn.net/Messageboard/07-08-06/discussion.cgi.7.html
Also, at the moment of the Shanksville 9/11 fiasco, Susan Mcelwain saw it.
http://911review.com/articles/reijden/911_my_own_review.htm
Those Gulfstream models are infamous for their use by the C.I.A. as Rendition Aircraft, as the C.I.A. and the military change their tail numbers at will.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rendition_aircraft

Also, two of the most despicable individuals connected to 9/11 have been closely tied to the company that manufactures the Gulfstream: Donald Rumsfeld and Richard Perle. I hope somebody may take it off from here!

2- Jane Barrer, seen at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvgAvTDpMac
Took the picture at 3:16 where you can see a chopper under the smoke (Tim Hayes and Pat Walsh equipped with their 'holographic projector' cloaking to camouflage the missile), it seems that the numerous 'military orbs' seen in the 9/11 footage included several infamous choppers with cloaking technology to camouflage themselves:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYpGZbAGpEU

Barrer's picture can also be seen at 2:52 while Jeff Erber talks by the side of his wife Mamie Ogawa.

Some info on how the Zionism that did 9/11 keeps messing up things:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/la-times-op-ed-anti-zionism-is-hate-crime.html

PS: Be noble and do your own research, trust nobody, but you. Any association is suspect when it comes to the 9/11 research.

To see the Zionist paramilitary training camp in the U.S.: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsKK3q0iFgs (thanks to spaced9)

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Continuos
• Pieces
• 911
• Jeff
• Hill
• Pumpitout
• 9/11
• Peter
• Better
• stealth
• cloak
• cloaked
• pumpitout.com
• genghis6199
• Jane
• Barrer
• Erber
• Mamie
• Ogawa
• Day
• Towers
• Fell
• E-4B
• C-20
• Gulfstream
• rendition
• aircraft
• CIA
• C.I.A.
• Military
• Pentagon
• Hayes
• Walsh
• chopper
• orb
• cloaking
• camouflage
• missile
• WTC
• WTC2
• John
• Farmer
• 911files
• Mark
• Howard
• Gaffney
• mystery
• jet
• vanishing
• America
• David
• Beter
• Falklands
• War
• 1982
• amateur
• photographer

[2JOHNNYT]

Whats so hard to believe that they flew something into the buildings - plane, drone, missile - but the videos are faked to cover whatever was sent in. Obviously, when no wreckage of the 4 planes that day are recovered a REASONABLE person can assume THERE WERE NO PLANES.

[07august]

So many videos were doctored after the fact. So many people were paid to lie, ie be eyewitnesses.

The videos ARE fake.

[nazirdjon]

by the shape of the wreckage Pentagon was NOT hit by a plane. The buildings were indeed hit by the plane. wouldn't everybody think this way?

[ChristianHolloway7]

watch this canadian cunt everyone. hes slowly taking all his phone calls/videos off the net. anyone with phone calls mp3 please upload.

[piwacket33]

Back it up to 2:51 or so and keep your eye on the bottom rhs of the screen at 2:56 something zooms in from a lower elevation, advances really fast, peaks and "flies" away in a descending arc. Could be an insect, but I make no assumptions when it comes to 9/11 anymore.

[pumpitout]

The BBC, where the heck did you come up with that one, ha, ha, ha!!!

[OutofBoxExperience]

Is it so hard to believe that Jeff Hill works for the BBC?

[2JOHNNYT]

So You're saying it was a PVI image on tv, like the yellow first down line they always have, you're not saying that people on the street, on the scene that day saw this PVI image fly overhead - only people on tv correct?

[07august]

It was a PVI virtual image generated on the helicopter shot. Time for you all to learn about virtual imaging which is the descendant of smart bomb technology from Persian Gulf War. 5 lines have to be plotted on a camera shot to create a wireframe on a camera shot. It is not complicated. You see PVI images generated on football fields every week during football season. Google, PVI, learn the technology and learn how easy it is to create virtual advertising.

No hologram, but PVI virtual image.