Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Iraq Conflict and Hope Part 9: Winds of Change

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,531
Google+
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 6, 2008

This shows the possitive news on Iraq starting with their first true free elections to in which even WOMEN were allowed to vote for the very first time. Something the feminists here refuse to give us credit for.

How the possitive changes in Iraq have already given hope to other middle-eastern countries and have already made possitive changes in Lebannon.

THE POINT OF THIS MOVIE THE WAR ON TERROR AND THE WAR IN IRAQ IS THIS. Something Bush (because he is a lousy speaker) won't or can't say.

Is that if the middle-east gets a taste of TRUE Freedom and Democracy, that hopefully other nations will follow. Now what does this have to do with 9/11?

Answer 9/11 happened for many reasons but one of them was that terror was allowed to grow in 3rd world countries that supported terror.

George W. Bush's theory is that if there are more democracies in the middle-east it will be LESS SAFE HAVENS for terrorist to set up camp, thus LESS OF A CHANCE for another 9/11 to happen to us or other nations.

What is amazing is that even DEMOCRATS think that DEMOCRACY can't succeed in the middle-east. Maybe they should change their name?

Bush has also pointed this out, that the terrorists hate freedom. Many Americans esspecially on the left not only DON'T BELIEVE THAT but think it's ridiculous. The truth is they don't understand.

Of course TERRORISTS HATE FREEDOM. Becuase freedom means CHOICE. It means that the young men in thier countries get to choose their leaders and their destiny's.

Unlike the radical Sheeik's where they convince young men to become suicide bombers and future jihadists. Young men AND WOMEN can go to school to become doctors, lawyers, businessmen, and many more. Which is a THREAT to the Statis Quo of the current middle-east.

Radical terrorism IS A THREAT because it means UNSTABILITY in a sane world.

Many blame George W Bush for the terrorists hating America. The truth is AL-QAEDA has always hated America you've just been forced to pay attention to it.

"If we fail to defeat this radical religious jihadists and I say this as an Atheist and what I consider to be still a freedom loving Liberal [who supports George Bush and the War on Terror] (and I would be saying the same thing if it were radical Christians) if we lose to these barbarians of radical Islam IT WILL BE THE END OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION AS WE KNOW IT" Para-Phrasing Chrisopher Hitchens speaking before a Californian College in front of FSTV'S Amy Gooding. October 2006. TO IN WHICH HE WAS BOOED OFF STAGE BY LIBERAL COLLEGE STUDENTS.

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Brilliant thanks for posting I really enjoyed this.

  • Good documentary. I have to confess I was firmly in the "anti-america-at-all-costs" camp, but looking over the facts at the last 5 years has made my old assumptions and opinions untenable. I'm not a supported of the Iraq war but I am with regime change and freedom. I just don't know how you can have one without the other!

see all

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @GaiusIuliusTaberna Oh no, another supposed staunch lefty turned war mongering idiot like Hitchens. You haven't changed. You were a prick then and you're a prick now.

    '4.Hide your face and weep if you dare to harm a child.'

    No, you just prefer to just hide from the children you harm. Twat.

  • @funkydreddUK Its not a cult jackass... the mushroom cloud flags weren't just reported by hitchens either... Hezbollah aren't exactly subtle about their insanity.

  • Well, it looks like they're going to be right about Egypt!

  • @DYORPEEPS Any army who risk their lives on patriotic/nationalistic lines in all male units trained to kill shouldn't be in charge, without accountability, of women and children of the enemy that tries to kill them. There is more spotlight on armies based on the western democratic model due to concepts free press, separation of church and state, and freedom from religious persecution than under the main alternatives: Sharia Law, Communism or secular military dictatorships.

  • It helps when pointing the finger at one nation that you are clear what you actually stand for. I have a particular interest in genocidal campaigns against minorities in the Third World which is why these ideals which are prevalent while by no means perfect in democracy is 'beloved' to me. If the above is not important to you then it is not important you.

  • @rgiri77 Where in that statement does it say women under rubble were raped? Check the facts, some soldiers were sent back for sex with prostitutes, some of which were claimed to be minors. Those are the facts.

    I suggest you look into your beloved US army and what they've been up to in Iraq and Afghanistan. But in your deluded world they're too righteous to have committed any crimes.

  • @DYORPEEPS

    Found this in a couple of seconds via Google.

    On Haiti:

    "The charges against the Sri Lankan soldiers may include rape involving children under 18 years of age" - UN Paper on Haiti

  • @DYORPEEPS On Sri Lanka:

    Amnesty said “to [our] knowledge ... one successful prosecution has been brought in a case where the victim of rape was also murdered.”

    "... lack of serious investigation into allegations of gang rape and murder of women and girls by the Sri Lankan security forces" - United Nations Special Rapporteur -

    Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) protested that “Sri Lankan security forces are using systematic rape and murder of Tamil women to subjugate the Tamil population"

  • Re: Funkydredd (doing this manually since another user marked his/her message as spam).

    Actually I've finally realised you are an isolationist supporter of the antiwar stance. There is nothing to be gained from arguing with you because you would maintain any war where the UK is not directly attacked by a conventional army is a waste of money regardless if that country is a sanctury for suicide bombers who have attacked this country and commit genocide against minorities.

    We'll agree to disagree.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more