Dr. John C. Eastman "Birthright Citizenship" Part 1

Given at Chapman University, 10/30/07

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• immigration
• overpopulation
• californians
• illegal
• immigrant

[ratbstard718]

In other words, there is no such thing as American citizenship without allegiance to the nation. Why make citizens of those who owe no allegiance to the country, who might join the forces of another country against you? This goes to the core of American allegiance.

[3Haydens]

well...if you owe your allegiance to another country as ALL illegal aliens do, you are NOT a citizen of the USA, period. As such, you are NOT entitled to the rights of citizenship like social services. The constitution mandates that ALL children living in the US go to school, period, just like you have to obey traffic laws. THAT is not "under the jurisdiction, taking the oath of allegiance that all AMERICAN citizens take" that makes them citizens, as Eastman explains.

[Sleeko11]

@treefres Would care to cite the specific law broken by European immigrants....Didn't think so.

[Sleeko11]

"[The 14th amendment] will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of person."........ Jacob Howard, author of the 14th Amendment

[scotthead61]

What about Obama, He doesn't fit the 14th ammendment. He was born under British Jurisdiction.

[christoJihad2]

Too bad, we won. And we'll win this fight too. Count on it. Get over it, get an education and provide for your family instead of remaking the Southwest into Mexico. If you love Mexico so much, why don't you live there? The illegals are generally the least educated in Mexico, and the best of their education system isn't well regarded to say the least. Don't blame us for all your ills. Drugs, gangs, etc. I don't get it, man, why do you guys glamorize gangs? What good have they done for your race?

[legalatina]

Not so..Plyer was an equal protection case, not a 14th amendment case brought by MALDEF.  The decision was not based on law it was an activist judge and this too, will be overturned.

[illegaldestroyer]

Fourteenth Amendment

Section 1 All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

[RalphNelson]

And the reason is because the child was under the state's jurisdiction

[ddstatler]

No, Plyler vs. Doe stated that they were due a public education as a resident of the state.

[RalphNelson]

Not a citizen no benefits. Right. I agree. Of course those born to parents who are under the jurisdiction of the US are citizens. And the Supreme Court found that illegal aliens are under the jurisdiction of the US while they are here. Anchor babies are citizens until the decision is reversed.

[3Haydens]

NOT citizens, that's the issue!!! Illegal aliens DEMAND that their anchor babies are citizens, so they can rip off ALL the social services possible. Subject the jurisdiction thereof meaning subject, permanently, to the laws and rights of citizens of the USA. Can't have it both ways, like YOU and the illegal aliens want, Ralph. Not a citizen? NO BENEFITS!!