Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

A Socialist at Occupy Wall Street

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
454 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 4, 2011

An avowed socialist at Occupy Wall Street advocates violence in seizing the means of production.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ariarmstrong)

  • Wow, the interviewer is an extreme-statist.

    The truth is that the United States has a very violent labor history, it goes all the way back during the Industrial revolution --- you know --- reading a book to someone while your stuck in some factory for twelve hours.

    Obivously, this isn't an axiom system were there are right and wrong answers, this interview is just a classic example of conflicting values. I mean, one guy (interviewer) is a pompous, jingoist and the other is just oppressed.

  • @TheDemocracyFighter If I had any idea what you were talking about I'd consider replying.

  • U are advocating violence with this video... that men is being paid by you... STOP YOUR POLITICAL AGENDA YOU MORON.

  • @quebestiadecarro I'm not sure what you're claiming. Obviously the guy being interviewed is advocating violence; just as obviously I the interviewer am not. I'm not sure who you think is "being paid," but nobody's paid me for conducting the interview, and I'm pretty sure nobody paid the socialist (certainly I did not).

Top Comments

  • @ariarmstrong I beg your pardon, my comment was not clear, i know that you are not a libertarian. What I meant was simply that when libertarians assert that the non-initiation of force principle can be treated as an axiom and that it doesn't matter why someone holds to that position they are talking out of their hats. The person you interviewed here claimed that employment is exploitation- an initiation of force. If it doesn't matter why one opposes force, or how one approaches epistemology...

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TheDemocracyFighter translation: you're the problem, not the solution. In other words, the problem never solves for itself, moron. Ergo, marxist-socialist-progressive-­democrat-anarchist problems do not solve themselves, nor solve for problems created by problems. But, nice try, pixie-duster. You asshats think deficit spending solves problems, but the problem cannot solve itself. IN plain English, revenue must exceed expenditures. get a job, pay taxes, & grow up, FAILURE

  • @TheDemocracyFighter roflmcao. idiot

  • @TheDemocracyFighter you dumbass. LOL. marxism is the road out of "capitalism" into socialism through MARXISM, according to Marx-Lenin. You don't know what you're talking about, retard. FAIL

  • @wouldee5150

    There's nothing about socialism in Marx, he wasn't a socialist philosopher — there are about five sentences in Marx's whole work that refer to socialism, twat. He was a theorist of capitalism, twat. I think he introduced some interesting concepts, to say the least.

    Anyway, you're an idiot, and that's already been proven. FACT.

  • @wouldee5150

    "You're self-righteous delusions"

    What? No-write-English-good?

    "Otherwise sit down"

    I am sitting down.

    "shut up"

    No.

    "learn something about yourself"

    Okay, um, I'm a lot smarter than you.

  • @wouldee5150

    I do, I'm involved with several Libertarian-anarchist groups around my community.

    Nice try, idiot. FAIL.

  • @TheDemocracyFighter ROFLMCAO. You're a delusional idiot. You're self-righteous delusions expulcate you from guilt in your mind because your ad hominem and red herrings serve your false dilemmas. Try practicing what you preach on the merit and standing of your ideology, sans parasiticism. Otherwise sit down, shut up, and learn something about yourself. FAIL.

  • @ariarmstrong I would add that marxists foment ontological equivalence with respect to legitimizing a spurious conjectural basis for subversion of the US Constitution.

    Marxists despise merit because they are takers, not givers. They are merely parasitic covetous thieves.

    Marxists exhibit unwillingness to exert effort toward positive outcomes that benefit others insubordinate to specious power & control

    Marxists have no moral compass, therefore incapable of ethical conduct. wicked

  • @wouldee5150

    Ha, I see you have several accounts, ariamstrong.

    Now, go watch a Football game you Capitalist-sheep.

  • @ariarmstrong ditto

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more