Evolution of man

This is a short video which deals with the propaganda and distortions of evolutionary charts. The video is short and not of the best quality for definition but does contain good information.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• human
• evolution
• God
• reason
• love
• evil
• history
• genesis
• atheism
• Darwin
• propaganda
• occult
• Dawkins
• bones
• bigfoot
• atheist
• bible
• debate
• islam
• philosophy
• allah
• god jesus
• haunted
• paranormal

[AtheistinFundyLand]

Why are you afraid of ratings?

[DrStevenz]

@AtheistinFundyLand I'm not. I just consider them to have no value on this large secular site.

[agentorange20]

Homo Georgicus and Rudolfensis both fit in nicely between Erectus and Habilis.

So each of the fossils we have are wrongly dated too?

I don't see what you've proven, as even the evolution from the more human like Ergaster, Erectus, Heidelbergensis, to Archaic Sapiens and finally modern Sapiens is still evident regardless of the earlier australopithecines.

[agentorange20]

Erectus' and Ergaster brain case's were around 800cc, hardly fully human. Heidelbergensis' were around 900-1200cc, again not human, when the modern Sapien craniums are around 1600-2000cc.

Go check out 'From Lucy to Language' Plenty of specimins there for you to ponder over.

[thoughtpattern0]

thanks for producing facts that refute the evolution of man. by facts i mean statements and opinions that you make. actually i learned nothing from this video except i find it interesting how you comment on the end that just because something looks in between species doesnt mean it is. and your comment on variation. you then obviously believe in evolution. in order for variation evolution is of necessity. other wise we would all be clones.

[agentorange20]

@c1zx "Irreducible complexity"

yawwwn. Something that Ken Miller and other biologists addressed and refuted over 6 years ago. Behe *thinks8 blood clotting cascade, the flagella, & the mammalian immune system are IC systems, but as shown in Dover his position is one of ignoring the already volumes of material on how they likely co-opted parts in he past.

[c1zx]

watch?v=q1iCjKWzeEE&feature=re­lated

Irreducible complexity

There are structures inside cells that are so complex that they had to have been developed top down, not brick by brick up, they did not 'evolve' they were designed top down.

Microbiology shows that Darwinian Evolution is impossible.

AND THAT IS STATING IT MILDLY.The video link above is what they now teach in colleges, technology evolves fast and so what was true and popular yesterday is outdated info today.

[darsal123]

I agree with your video!!