Flight 175 Impact Scott Myers Zoom Slow Motion
Top Comments
All Comments (14)
-
@GaminCro And ask your friend if he saw any markings, if he said he did, he's a bloody liar.
-
@GaminCro Those who were right under the plane said it was fully grey, those who saw it from far away and not under said it had no stripes, people have eyes, they know the difference between an airliner and a fully grey plane when they see it, and you'll see different angles from people on my video.
I have got hold of 11 people amature footage of groups of people saying the planes were DEFINETELY NO AIRLINERS. And the video proofs it aswell, what more do you expect?
Just watch the video.
-
@Xendrius Most of them were right under the plane, how can you see markings and windows if the plane is right above you?And most of the people who the news reporters were talking to were on the outskirts of the City, and later went closer to see what is going on...So yeah, none of them actually got a clear sight, and a friend of mine who was there on that day, confirmed it was a commercial airliner because he was on a boat fishing...
-
photo shop jaja
-
@kantwater666 yea they are so idiot that are unabe to paint a plane as a commercial airline. how much is an idiot thing to say? isdue to sun and low quality of footage google Flight 175
-
This is a military plane
-
@dgelevators1 You gota be kidding me, also there is not even a single person that day who confirms an airliner hit the towers, only 5 people saw the planes good enough, that is Bri, she said it looked like a military plane, then we have an old man with glasses, saying it was no airliner but a big grey plane, then we have a woman saying "that is no american airlines", and then we have Mark Birnbach from fox saying "it was definetely no commercial plane, no windows or markings".
-
@Xendrius i see a United airlines Boeing 767-223ER with DARK BLUE paint(plus a little grey on the top of the fuselage) and well please grab an image of a 2001 vintage united aircraft and you will see what im talking about
-
@Xendrius That pod is the landing gear doors, they are kind of bulbous on a 767. The color is indeterminate from such a desaturated video, its hard to say from this video. You could be right about that or you could be wrong from the evidence of this video alone other videos show the correct markings though.
-
@VitreousCut No it does not, the airliners are longer, and this one has the same color on the underside as well as the top side, it has no markings and it has a pod attached to it with a very strong white tip.
Friend, your work is amazing and very strong. If I may...
This image is one of the more disturbing videos shot that day. The full image viewed in it's original form is breath taking and is a marker in the progression of humanity.
Though I know you are doing work that would honor the families and the victims of this day let us not forget them. They are the reason for this investigation.
The honor of the fallen must be restored, and this is the only way we can see justice is served. Never again
RuffleTheTeacher 2 years ago 6
I certainly agree, good job and the truth will come. Good people like yourself are helping the truth come forward. I'm from Canada but still would like the facts to start coming out and I feel they are slowly starting to happen. The "nano- thermite" found in the dust is going to be the smoking gun evidence and will be pretty hard to explain away I think and I am in no way a "Truther". I'm just a common man and like a lot of people with common sense would like an honest investigation into 911
NeilCrouse 2 years ago 3