Part I of a three part documentary on the forces that brought Adolf Hitler to the position of supreme power over the lives of hundreds of millions of people.
Honestly, though, I have to say that is slightly better than the Lamarckist Lysenkoism that Stalin and communist Russia instituted. Their agriculture still hasn't recovered.
Thats what I'm afraid of with Creationism/ID. Thinking that crop failure can be solved by mass prayer.
And he doesn't ... but surely was very successful in highjacking the word and distorting it into an ancillary of racial struggle ... so actually all he needed and all he had was the general aprehension, as vague as it might have been, of Darwin's studies ... and the idea of 'trying to evolve' in Dolfie was not lamarckist ... since he envisioned it could only be achieved thru selective and phenotypical breeding state policies ... something like an omnipresent chicken farmer of some kind ...
To my best knowledge, hitler never once mentioned darwin, or read anything about his theory.
He would have been sorely disappointed with Descent of Man. I've seen creationists try to use a particular part as evidence of darwins "Racism", yet when you go back and read it there's no such comparison between black people and apes, or distinction between white people and other races.
I think Hitler was probably more of a Lamarckist like Stalin. The idea that -trying- to evolve -does- souds Hitlerish.
Dolfie got introduced to Darwin by bubble gun knowledge. Dolfie was a very selective reader, he would only read whatever could be understood as confirming his racialist understanding of human beings ... even if it had to be distorted. In fact there are strong indications that he never really finished reading anything but racialist pamphlets. Yeah I advise you to go check Dolfies genealogy and look for the Frankenberger affair ... apart from that, Dolfie was at the best a shallow Darwinist ...
You can have both points. I need to go read my hitler genealogies again.
Reading back on the comments I fucked up when I said that I used them interchangeably. The first time I was referring to the concept that "Only the strong survive" in regards to hitler having obtained the philosophy from Darwin.
Read the rest of my comments. They concern the charge that hitler was heavily influenced by darwin.
"Only the strong survive" precedes Darwin. Should have made that more clear.
I'm reading a few things online and it looks like Hitler's dad changed his name to "Heidler" which can also be written "Hitler", yet the written surname "Hitler" is unique to Alois jr.
I probably made the mixed reference concerning the father's name change and "Alois jr."
You can doubt or "dunno", whichever comes first, as much as you want ... that won't change a 'iota' in the pages I have right before my 'own lying eyes' ... and this fragment of a video did not get the names 'wrong' ... you assumed so based on your long settled cripple knowledge
Duh ...
fredhubner 2 years ago
Yeah, that's eugenics for you.
Honestly, though, I have to say that is slightly better than the Lamarckist Lysenkoism that Stalin and communist Russia instituted. Their agriculture still hasn't recovered.
Thats what I'm afraid of with Creationism/ID. Thinking that crop failure can be solved by mass prayer.
WeedGreenPowerRanger 2 years ago
And he doesn't ... but surely was very successful in highjacking the word and distorting it into an ancillary of racial struggle ... so actually all he needed and all he had was the general aprehension, as vague as it might have been, of Darwin's studies ... and the idea of 'trying to evolve' in Dolfie was not lamarckist ... since he envisioned it could only be achieved thru selective and phenotypical breeding state policies ... something like an omnipresent chicken farmer of some kind ...
fredhubner 2 years ago
To my best knowledge, hitler never once mentioned darwin, or read anything about his theory.
He would have been sorely disappointed with Descent of Man. I've seen creationists try to use a particular part as evidence of darwins "Racism", yet when you go back and read it there's no such comparison between black people and apes, or distinction between white people and other races.
I think Hitler was probably more of a Lamarckist like Stalin. The idea that -trying- to evolve -does- souds Hitlerish.
WeedGreenPowerRanger 2 years ago
Dolfie got introduced to Darwin by bubble gun knowledge. Dolfie was a very selective reader, he would only read whatever could be understood as confirming his racialist understanding of human beings ... even if it had to be distorted. In fact there are strong indications that he never really finished reading anything but racialist pamphlets. Yeah I advise you to go check Dolfies genealogy and look for the Frankenberger affair ... apart from that, Dolfie was at the best a shallow Darwinist ...
fredhubner 2 years ago
You can have both points. I need to go read my hitler genealogies again.
Reading back on the comments I fucked up when I said that I used them interchangeably. The first time I was referring to the concept that "Only the strong survive" in regards to hitler having obtained the philosophy from Darwin.
Read the rest of my comments. They concern the charge that hitler was heavily influenced by darwin.
"Only the strong survive" precedes Darwin. Should have made that more clear.
WeedGreenPowerRanger 2 years ago
I'm reading a few things online and it looks like Hitler's dad changed his name to "Heidler" which can also be written "Hitler", yet the written surname "Hitler" is unique to Alois jr.
I probably made the mixed reference concerning the father's name change and "Alois jr."
Thanks for the correction.
WeedGreenPowerRanger 2 years ago
You can doubt or "dunno", whichever comes first, as much as you want ... that won't change a 'iota' in the pages I have right before my 'own lying eyes' ... and this fragment of a video did not get the names 'wrong' ... you assumed so based on your long settled cripple knowledge
of it ...
fredhubner 2 years ago
I expected you would claim something of the sort ... the terms you freely interchanged are not interchangeable ...
fredhubner 2 years ago
Look at the comment history. There's only 22 comments, and I used both terms interchangeably. You're splitting hairs.
Its 6 of one and half a dozen of the other at this point.
WeedGreenPowerRanger 2 years ago