Top Comments
All Comments (318)
-
Sarah just think's that so god damn hilarious, dosen't she.
-
@SavageJim01 Quick calc, then. How long do you think it takes for light to bounce from a geo-stationary satellite ? How far could a car travel in that space of time ? I reckon a max of 50 metres out, given the furthest satellite and max vehicle speed.
So you might adjust for the speed of light, but this is quite a different thing from acknowledging that the speed of light is a constant from every frame of reference, or using complex counterintuitive maths .
-
CHANGE TO FUCKING METRIC SYSTEM! Considered guy from Serbia!
-
@tonycatman It's because you are told to round off the errors. They are small for your purposes and can be discounted at your part of what you do.
Your calculations might be okay for calculating instantaneous position assuming instantaneous signal transmissions, but considering the distances and time for light to move as well as the movement of the Earth vs the movement of the satellite, that error becomes significant when calculating what position the sat will tell you.
-
@dookdawg214 To work, the system needs three out of a number of satellites. All of them are moving, and often, so is the vehicle.
The light speed delay is inconsequential in comparison to the speed of movement of the four points, and the system adjusts accordingly. The satellites are really not that far away.
A predictive speed model for the vehicle is used either way, and this is the thing which requires the greatest adjustment.
-
Pythagoras requires three fixed points, which you don't have in GPS tracking. A satellite in space -- or a receiver high up -- is not moving at the same speed as a fixed point on earth. So, by the time it takes for the data to go up and come back down -- if the system considers everything on the same time scale, which it's not -- your orginal fixed point is now farther away. Relativity recalculates to account for this lag.
-
my brain hurts.
-
@0ester If you were stupid ... and you were going 60 mph in a car ... you will still be stupid. But others would perceive you as moving towards greater stupidity even faster.
-
Sarah you slut
Why is this labeled as Einstein's Theory of Relativity? It does not even touch his theory, except at the end where it says, that classical relativity does not work at high speeds. This should be "Classical Relativity Made Easy"
0ester 2 months ago 9
Why does everyone always say that Satnav needs Einstein's relativity to work ? I worked for navman for two years, and I can tell you that we used Pythagoras. Is it a conspiracy ?
tonycatman 1 week ago 2