Its so easy (Velvet Revolver VS Guns N Roses)
Top Comments
All Comments (253)
-
@pj139q He had his worse moments but Chinese Democracy had some fantastic vocal performances in it!
-
@GoodGuitarSolos but you have to admit compared to were it (axl's voice) was between 89 - 93 he has gone down hill. DON'T GET ME WRONG. COULD I DO BETTER ...NO!!!!!!!!!! but i know he can. lol
-
It's a draw. They need slash and axl together to truly be the origanal amazing gnr
-
ni tiene vos axel se escuchan las guitarras no mas XD
-
@gunsnrosesrocker jajjajaja con ese infeliz de axel no creo que sea asi
-
AXL WINS
PD: I love VR and the New Guns but Axl voice cant be beaten for Scoot's voice,
-
velvet revolvers singer sucks terribly
-
id much rather see VR now thant he new gnr
-
It's kind of a draw on the music, with a slight nod to VR for being the creators of the music (instead of hired musicians to play someone else's music). However, Axl just kicks Scott's ass on the vocals.
-
I'm gonna have to go with VR. Their version has that raw sound of the original. New GN'R has too many guitarists using dumb effects and it sounds jumbled and sloppy. Plus, seeing as how Slash, Duff, and Matt were all in GN'R they actually know how to play the song. I mean, they've only been playing it for 22 years (with the exception of Matt). Just because it's a GN'R song doesn't mean the new GN'R automatically plays it better. Just listen to the musicianship.
I disagree with everything here: Chinese Democracy is amazing album, the band just doesn't have the magic of the original, legendary group. The musicians can definitely play but they just don't have the same charisma and legacy as guys like Slash.
Scott Weiland is awesome singer, so is Axl Rose. Talk shit about one of them: you don't know anything about vocals. Rose has incredibly wide range, whereas Weiland's voice is damn versatile and suits many different music styles.
GoodGuitarSolos 1 year ago 8
wow Velvet revolvers "its so easy" was fucking Brutal.. hahah GNR forever!!!
Gunsfann 2 years ago 2