Richard Dawkins - God, A Logical Fail

An excerpt from Chapter 2 of The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins.

Professor Dawkins discusses the creator of the Universe - the Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM), blessed be his noodly appendages.

Professor Richard Dawkins acknowledges that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is "UNDISPROVABLE" at 3:19.
Ramen.

For some reason he also mentions Gods that aren't real.

Tags:
Celestial teapot, orbiting, the invisible pink unicorn, zeus, thor fsm flying spaghetti monster, church, jesus christ, god, lord, creator, Bertrand Russell, faith, logic, philosophy, argument, creationism, bible, genesis, debate christopher hitchens, sam harris, pasta, secular humanism, fairies, reform, dogma, heretic, infidel, islam judaism, michael shermer, sceptic, professor, christianity, evolution, noodles, one god further, our saucy savior, camp quest, saviour, pirate

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• richard
• dawkins
• fsm
• flying
• spaghetti
• monster
• god
• creator
• jesus
• christ
• atheism
• antitheism
• bertrand
• russell
• teapot
• pasta
• thruthem
• thru
• them

[PeeGeeBeeDee]

@Anglican08 If The PREMISES Are TRUE And You're Trying To DEDUCTIVELY PROVE That They're TRUE, What's The Problem? You're Assuming Your PREMISE Is TRUE And You're Trying To PROVE That It's TRUE. That's What DEDUCTIVE REASONING Is.

Don't TRY To Come On Here With With DEEP Logic That Adds Up To Nonsense. OKAY. Here, Here's My DEEP Logic. Evolution Created A Psychological Need For GOD, Hence Man Created The Concept Of GOD Therefore GOD Really Doesn't Exist.

[AlphaKiloOscarZulu]

@Anglican08 You fail bro. You are correct in pointing out that guy's mistake but when you create your own argument for the existence of God you will get no further yourself. Have you even listened to the video?

[MrAsh183]

Richard Dawkins has the best sense of humour. I think he should be god :P

[LaGrangeband]

Haha, I just go one God further.

[Anglican08]

@thruthem to show God is a logical fail, you need to make a deductive argument where, if the premises are true, then the conclusion follows deductively. However your first premise A) "All Gods are man-made", means that you're assuming the very think you're setting out to prove. God's non existence needs to come out of your deduction, not your in premises.

[Gnomefro]

@doombybbr Hah! The Tooth Fairy sometimes uses parents for its own devious purposes. >=)

[doombybbr]

i could disprove the tooth fairy - it is actually parents

[josh218]

i was touched by my uncles noodly appendage as a child.

[AtheismGate]

"If there is a God, he is a malign thug." - Mark Twain