Pentium D Ownage

Warning, Pentium D owning everything! The error states "Own teh mac" he he he!

Music:
Alice Deejay
Richard Hell & Voidoids
Alberto Y lost trios paranoais

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Intel
• Pentium
• Mac
• Ownage
• emeek77
• high
• treason
• ya
• innit
• m8
• alice
• deejay
• richard
• hell
• alberto
• lost

[Andyterranbase1]

@hanrinch i bought my pentium d based computer in 2005, it the first version of it though runs at 3.2ghz

[Ammageddon89]

OMFG get glasses or learn how to read posts....

I'm feeling sorry for you HighTreason610. Some people just cant stop...

[hanrinch]

well sorry for the attitude earlier. in fact i just had the hatred on pentium d series that's all. i did mean to against you just let you know.

actually netburst wasn't an old timer, it's just too ahead of its time, like core/p6 back in 1993 which result of low performance/high cost. compare to amd phenom II's pro mature p5 achitect. it still had the potential. only if it can reduce the cost/and heat, egergy issue...

[HighTreason610]

I have not denied this, what's the deal with all this?

The point of this video:

A mac fan said his mac could multitask better than any PC, so i got this old pc with it's ancient netburst microarchitecture to proove that even older and slower PCs could outperform his mac - and presumable any mac at that time, which it did.

Why do you keep posting the same stuff?

[hanrinch]

core 2 and pentium dual core were just dual core version of pentium m that supported 64bit. it came out the same time as pentium d series whom use proscott core from netburst architect in december 2005.(oem version, retail version was around mid 2006 but soon shutdown in 2007 due to core's superior architect and lower cost. )

PS: many magazine in 2004 gave more credit on pentium m than pentium which core is superior than netburst.

[hanrinch]

well it was a huge issue since i was a victim of that series. i used to owned a pentium d 805 with intel 945chipset/1gb ddr2 533 + geforce 7600gs 256mb back to early 2007 which i spent more than $699. therefore the processor always gone overheated and eating power (150w) like starving kid from siberia or refugee from africa. air cooling only able kept it in 75c and gone overheat of 105c when full loaded.

and so is the benchmark it didn't even show its "699" value compare to pentium e5300

[HighTreason610]

Nope, i built it in 2005. That's when these processors were first made, maybe you are thinking of the "retail" versions.

I benchmarked it and uploaded my score on Passmark some time ago, so i could tell you what the file was for that if you wanted. It was just nipping the toes of a Core² (Cant remember which).

I still don't know why it is such an issue to you though.

[hanrinch]

the oldest pentium d came out in early 2006 (820), therefore your pentium d is low price range which came up in december 2006 just 2 months before pentium dc came out. soon after all netburst product line soddenly goes dead because pentium core actually out perform any pentium d in every benchmark which forced intel to shut it down.

PS: pentium d and pentium EE were focus on mid/high end market along with core 2 while pentium dc was in mid range-main stream market and it beats pentium d/ee.

[HighTreason610]

DId you not read my comment

"Also you miss the point, the machine was already old then anyway"

This is a very old Pentium D, it was old when the video was made. I built the machine around the time Pentium D first came out. If you are on a PC, why are you even bothering to argue with me? You should be on the same side as I am.

[hanrinch]

my builded my pc  with pentium dc e5300 back to late 2007 and it is out perform any pentium d series atleast twice!! even to pentium extreme edition 3.83ghz(with hyper thread) it still gain upper hand by roughly 38%.

and pentium dual core e5300 only cost $139 while pentium extreme edition 975 still cost $540 in 2007.

core architecture is seriously pwn netburst really bad