Cleopatra: A portrait of a killer (part6/6)
Top Comments
All Comments (96)
-
who was cleopatra's mother ??
-
@Erikjust THIS IS ONE WOMAN, IN A DYNASTY THAT SPANNED 10,000YRS NEXT TO THE SUDAN AND THE BLACK PEOPLE OF NUBIA WHO SHARED EXACTLY THAE SAME RACIAL MIX AND LOOK AT THE TRUE EGYPTIANS. IT IS OUTLANDISH TO VIEW THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS AS ANYTHING OTHER THAN A BLACK PEOPLE. DOES THE SPHINX LOOK LIKE BRITTANY SPEARS? LOL
-
@Erikjust Plus even if the theory amongst some scientist that she had African blood in their veins they would still be quite the amount of Greek in them so again if your suggesting that she was as black as the native Africans that´s simply isn´t true.
-
@Raybanmonster So the ancient Greeks wasn´t white? Very astonishing especially considering how we have well documented findings of that time and none of them says they were black.
You have to remember Cleopatra and her Family WASN`T Egyptians They where Greeks direct descendants of Alexander the Great's general, Ptolemy I Soter.
So no cover up there.
-
@g1a1r1y3 It's a good thing that most people you know are a microscopic representation of the World.
-
Most people I know have no interest because the history of some people or regions because "... it is not our history...". Ownership creates a problem for those who can't, or don't want to, claim ownership.Like whites in reference to African history or blacks to European history. Responsibility to history does not require ownership. It just requires interest, an open mind, and diligence- among other things.
-
@g1a1r1y3 We should take ownership because if we don't reflect on how good/bad we can be, we will continue to make the same mistakes.
-
I somewhat agree. History matters and knowing the truth matters. However, people want to take "ownership" of history and people and this is where I diverge. The worth and value of a people come from their actions and behavior not whether some historical figure was of a particular ethnicity. The Yugoslavs went to war for this same clash of visions and many other places in the world are still in conflict because of it. History has is purpose an duses, but not this one.
-
@g1a1r1y3 (continued) the right to be consider a man, a human being, a person with feelings. This is why what happened thousands of years ago is important, because people want PROOF in this court room of life, as skewed statistics are weighted against the soul of the black man everyday.
From early civilizations, humans had mix up, so I just got to the conclusion that we are all mixed in this periods. People that fight about racism, are indeed ignorants of all human history.
No one knows for sure all ancestry, unless you come from freaks in that aspect, but that doesn't really mean you're not mixed.
What about if in all atmospherical disasters, wars, illnesses and all has happened, mixing was necessary for life? I mean, emigrating has always happened. There's 2 much 2 uncover.
Melody0fMe 9 months ago 5
NO AFRICAN EVER BELIEVED THIS WOMAN WAS A PURE WHITE EUROPEAN WOMAN. UTTER RACIST NONSENSE PERPETUATED BY A WRONGFUL CASTING OF LIZ Taylor IN A WHITE MEDIA BUYING FILM WORLD. DISGUSTING. ITS LIKE MAKING THE UK QUEEN OUT TO BE BLACK.
Raybanmonster 1 month ago 3