BBC edits Larry Silverstein pull it wtc7 lies kerry controlled fashion wtc 7

A compilation of "inaccuracies" in the official and media representation of the world trade center 7 wtc 7 collapse, includes the bbc's careful editing of larry silversteins comments, the actual facts, john kerry's bizarre answer relating to wtc7's collapse, + george bush's words of wisdom to the international community - can also apply to the comments of mainstream media in general

(height/distance) d = 174m
(time for collapse) t = 6.5s
d = Va X t (Va is Average Velocity)
Va = d / t
Va = 174 / 6.5
Va=26.7
V1 (intitial velocity) = 0
Va = Vf+V1 / 2 (Vf is final velocity)
Va X 2 = Vf+V1
26.7 X 2 = Vf+0
Vf = 53.5
^V (change in velocity) = Vf-V1
^V = 53.5 - 0
^V = 53.5m/s
^V = a X t
53.5 = a x 6.5s
a = 53.5/6.5

a = 8.2 m/s/s for wtc building 7

"a" in a vacuum at freefall with zero resistance is 9.8m/s/s
"a" at freefall with air resistance is noticably lower.

which would imply that the lower floors disappeared as the upper floors descended.
The 40,000 tonnes of structural steel reinforced with concrete and heavy duty bolts were designed to withstand
earthquakes and tornados
and stand for over 100 years while supporting the weight of the upper floors + more
how can 47 floors of heavy duty structure holding bolts snap simultaneously due to fire
why did all the structural steel reinforced with concrete pulverize into dust or resist less than thin air due to isolated pockets of open air fire - when no plane hit it ??????

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• wtc
• wtc7
• collapse
• bbc
• edits
• manipulates
• larry
• silverstein
• silverstein's
• comments
• pull
• it
• john
• kerry
• abz2000
• 9/11
• 911
• abz2000123

[abz2000123]

It's not- unless you have the facts, though I was more convinced after I saw the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, & all the murderous lies that followed, then when I researched it I found that it's obvious. Bush saw the 1st plane hIt on tv live, when the 1st plane footage was TAPE recorded and released the next day, why did u never hear of wtc7 on tv? Until it went viral on the net??? See my false flag terror page before saying it's not obvious, it IS obvious to nearly every1 I speak to

[adcashmo]

OK I know the BBC is majorly biased (all u need to do is read anything on media lens), but this clip shows no connection between the word 'pull' and 'pulling a building down'.

'Pull' could mean 'pull people out' because it was dangerous. And then they saw the bulding come down as predicted.

'Traces' of exposives may have been found somewhere nearby, but there are traces of lots of things everywhere. U need a lot of equipment to demolish a building....and....how would they sneak it in?

[abz2000123]

@adcashmo scroll to 3:24 to find references to the term "pull" from wtc, secondly - there were no firemen in the building according to fema nist and frank fellini, they were told to evacuate at 11:30am due to water shortages, and definitely watch the vid: lucky larry silverstein exposed - to see how he reacts to the question when told the fire dept commander denied having that conversation with him. scroll to 2 minutes on that vid, i hope to release a vid with that as part of it,

peace,

abz

abz

[adcashmo]

@abz2000123 Firemen...other people....makes no odds...could still mean "make sure we pull people out"....how would he know for sure everyone was out.....many meanings from even this idea...... It's ambiguous.

If he demolished the building and didn't want people to know, the last thing he would do is say something on tv. And if he did slip up he wouldn't carry on the sentance or repeat it. And if he didn't care who knew he would have said it straight i.e. "I decided to demolosh the building"

[abz2000123]

@adcashmo hi, i'm not going to get into a long winded conversation about it as the info is clearly in the video - where kerry admits "they did it in a controlled fashion, and tops of buildings don't go through solid structural steel and concrete and snap thousands of heavy duty bolts simultaneously - and then fall at the speed of gravity through thin air. the 6.5 second collapse is enough to assure a child that mud and bamboo huts don't fall like that due to isolated pockets of fire,

peace,

abz

[abz2000123]

(distance) d = 174m (time) t = 6.5s d = Va X t (Va is Average Velocity) Va = d / t Va = 174 / 6.5 Va=26.7 V1 (intitial velocity) = 0 Va = Vf+V1 / 2 (Vf is final velocity) Va X 2 = Vf+V1 26.7 X 2 = Vf+0 Vf = 53.5 ^V (change in velocity) = Vf-V1 ^V = 53.5 - 0 ^V = 53.5m/s ^V = a X t 53.5 = a x 6.5s a = 53.5/6.5 a = 8.2 m/s/s for wtc building 7 "a" at freefall with air resistance is noticably lower than 9.8m/s/s which would imply that the lower floors disappeared as the upper floors descended.

[adcashmo]

@abz2000123 I think I might be convinced if I saw the whole interview with Larry, not just a clip where the camera doesn't even stay on his face inbetween lines. Not saying it's bullshit, but come on......it's not smart to make a judgement with such little evidence. It's the reverse-scientific method.

[adcashmo]

@abz2000123 I'm actually willing to be open minded on this. And that's very nice info, but there is still no real evidence. U even say urself it's only an implication. Wikileaks will eventually leak something im sure. But I think that would have happened already actually.

[importfilta]

Ive heard of "pull out" but NEVER just "pull". Has anyone else?

[mcnowski]

sure gives a new meaning to the term "DAMAGE CONTROL".......