Full-sized Cessna 180 ZK-EKG makes a dicey cross-wind landing at Tokoroa
Uploader Comments (xjet)
Top Comments
-
FYI, it's a 172N
All Comments (36)
-
no cross wind correction on the ailerons after landing.
must have been a rookie.
-
if hed of had some gliding experience, he might of done better.
-
@bobcook28 do you not see the crab angle? what do you think planes fly sideways normally then? nice landing. pro.
-
Landing was downwind, see the windsock at 1:06, take off was into the wind, look at how he weather vanes into the wind after lifting off the ground!
I remember one crosswind landing when I was a student pilot on a long cross country flight, I had the left rudder pedal all the way to the floor to line up for touchdown, a local CFI noted in my logbook "Arrived alive in Ada Oklahoma"!
-
did it takeoff with tailwind or against the wind?
-
yup. Air Hawkes Bay Limited's Cessna 172N
What are you talking about, look at the wind sock! It's showing not a lot of cross wind, also if the pilot had to carry out a cross wind landing then he or she would probably approach by crabbing the aircraft then kicking the rudder to straighten up last minute.
cptK737 1 month ago
@cptK737 There are 3 different windsocks at our airfield and, due to their locations, it's quite common for them to be pointing in three different directions -- none of them indicating the true wind direction.
xjet 1 month ago
Cross winds? the windsock is drooping down.
It is probably a calibrated 15 knot windsock.
poor landing in general
bobcook28 1 month ago
@bobcook28 The windsocks are very deceptive at this airfield. They tend to read low and often the three socks will be pointing in totally different directions -- catches a lot of pilots out.
xjet 1 month ago
Bruce..its gone from a 172 to a 180..now its a nose wheeled 185...and India just put Aussie out of the world cup...lucky day for indians today..Im glad I was only watching..the guy that got out look a bit relieved...and who gets out just to pay landing fees after a landing like that..and at an airport that has none.
48horijoe 11 months ago
@48horijoe You said it was a 172 on approach -- I mistakenly put 185 in the video but got it right with 180 in the title. Actually, I'm pretty damned sure it was a Spitfire -- wasn't it?
xjet 11 months ago 4