Rev Disrupts The Police Checkpoint

I assumed responsibility, and informed the Unconstitutional police officers of my town that there was at least one citizen that knew his rights.

Transcript Below;
Pig- "Sir, May I see Your ID"
Rev- "whats That?"
Pig- "May I see your I.D"
Rev- "Why do you .need to see my I.D"
Pig- "Because You're making unreasonable noise in the park"
Rev- "Its not louder than that truck"
Pig- "OK Well, That's a motor vehicle"
Rev- " I also have, I have the right..."
Pig- [Interrupts] "OK That's fine, can I see your I.D?"
Rev- "You are violating my rights"
Pig- "Can I see your ID?"
Rev- "YOU ARE VIOLATING MY RIGHTS
Pig- "CAN I SEE YOUR ID"
Rev- "No You CANNOT!"
Pig- "I'm asking Can I see your ID, Otherwise you are going to be arrested for Obstruction"
Pig- "Those are your choices"
Rev- "I do not have my ID
Pig- "You don't have any ID?"
Pig- "What is your name and date of birth?"
Rev- "I'm a Constitutional Scholar"
Pig- "What is your name and date of birth?"
Pig- "I'm not asking you what you are I'm asking for your information"
Rev- "I have the right to be secure in my property"
Pig- "You do not have the right to have that, I'm asking you for it right now"
Rev- " I don't have that right?"
Pig- "OK, Last choice, give it to me, give me your information, otherwise your going to be arrested for obstruction.
Rev- "Obstruction of what?"
Pig- "Justice!"
Rev- "Justice?"
Pig- "I'm asking you for your information, because your making unreasonable noise on a PA system"
Rev- "I'll turn it off"
Pig- "I'm not seeing you out in the park with a PA system, I'm talking like a civil adult. Can I see your ID and have your name and information?
Rev- "I'm going to exercise my 5th amendment right, and my 4th amendment right"
Pig- "I'm not searching and seizing you"
Rev- "Your searching for my papers"
Pig- "I'm not, I'm asking for your information, That's where we're at right now, OK?"
Rev- "I have a right to be secure in my information"
Pig- "No you're not....when a police officer ask for your information, you have the right to give the information to the officer, otherwise you can be arrested for obstruction, OK?" I'm not going to sit here and dispute it,
Rev- "What charge are you.....
Pig- "Obviously, Obstructing governmental administration, How many times do I need to explain this to you? OK I tell you the same thing over and over and over, How about you show me some information so I know who I'm dealing with, Obviously you know I'm a police officer, I want to know who you are, OK I have to do an incident report because I stopped and talked.....
Rev- "I'M A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES TALKING TO A SERVANT OF THE UNITED STATES"
Pig- "OK"
Rev- "And as a citizen I will act upon my rights to leave"
Pig- "OK I need to know who you are so I can do an incident report to say that I talked to you at this date and time at this location, So you don't understand what I need"
Rev- "So If I give you my name, I can exercise my right to leave?
Pig- "YAH! I want to know who you are......so I can identify you"
Rev- "You understand that I'm just trying to inform the citizens of their rights?"
Pig- "How are we illegally searching someone"
Rev- "Are you guys asking people for their identification at all?"
Pig- "Not until we pull them over"

Clearly the guy is breaking the law. You can hear the rest. If there are any constitution lawyers out there willing to work pro-bono, please contact me.

PS- This was my first cop confrontation, I'll do better next time. Also....the camera adds 20lbs. In the words of the wise Rage against the Machine,..... Fuk Da Police.

resist@revolutionrequired.com

http://www.revolutionrequired.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

• revolutionrequired
• revolution
• required
• police
• check
• point
• unconstitutional

[mainemikeiii]

You read with intent not with an open mind... You read until you find what it is you're looking for and go no further... State and local Police don't enforce federal (aka Union) law. They enforce state and local laws... You are wrong to suggest that State and Local Police are entirely outside the Constitution. If you were correct there would be no State and Local Police. You are damaging your own credibility, Soften your position on things you don't know about and stick to the things you do.

[RevolutionRequired]

@mainemikeiii But the laws of the state cannot violate your rights. Article XI of the Constitution. [This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.]

[RevolutionRequired]

@mainemikeiii The state lost its power to enforce laws when it signed The Constitution of the United States. Under Amendment 10 if the power is given to the federal government then the state government does not have that power. The power of law enforcement was given to the federal government in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution. Therefor, the state police have no authority and are a breach of the Constitution in their own existence.

[mainemikeiii]

further more... what I said was "There are certain exceptions to the 4th amendment... Perhaps the most critical in this situation is the exception that has to do with vehicles."

If that suggests that I believe the exception is actually in the constitution than I apologize... I thought we were both beyond that point in our understanding of the constitution itslef. The fact remains I'm correct and you are not... But I like your videos and I think you'll get it right one of these days.

[RevolutionRequired]

@mainemikeiii I made it clear that the said 'exception' was not in the constitution. In fact...if you have studied the constitution you would know that the states surrendered their rights to enforce the laws of the union when they signed the constitution. Where do I get that from? Well, I get that from Article 1 Section 8 (read it) and Amendment 10 (read it) The power to enforce the laws of the union is given to the militia. And under amendment 10, the states do not have that power. Read.

[mainemikeiii]

There are certain exceptions to the 4th amendment... Perhaps the most critical in this situation is the exception that has to do with vehicles. Please take the time to learn everything there is to know about someone elses job before you pretend to know more about it than they do. The fact is you don't... Arm yourself with knowladge and then go on the offensive. The reason you gave your name was you were not sure if you had the right to refuse, which at that time you didn't. Information is power.

[RevolutionRequired]

@mainemikeiii Show me where in the Constitution those 'exceptions' are? In fact, those 'exceptions' you are referring to are contractual laws. Statutory laws that people are subject to because they signed over their rights when they signed a drivers license. You need to read the constitution. You will not find vehicular exceptions to the 4th amendment in the Constitution. It makes me laugh even considering you actually thought that.

[cheath432]

I bet you didn't take him to court because you look like a pussy. Nothing the police officer did was unlawful, you violated a city ordinance, which he was nice enough to not arrest you for. Secondly, to anyone reading this, every state is different with these laws so don't go around trying to act all big and bad because it may end you up in jail. In my state, North Carolina, a police officer can ask you for your ID at anytime for any reason, if you don't comply you are then arrested.

[MajorRick12345]

@mainemikeiii I believe you may be referring the the 'Carroll doctrine' as it applies to 'vehicle searches. However, there still must be reasonable suspicion of a crime, blah, blah, This came from opinion of SCOTUS case 'carroll v. US' It is, I would guess, similar to the exigent circumstances "exception."

[libra8a]

Apparently there is one citizen who knows his rights but did not stand up for them. Grow a set. Pig was wrong and you had it on video.

[rumandcoke32]

he would have arrested him buy now...this is bullshit fucking bitch ass cops

[lewin5211]

YOu didnt even really try to stand up!!!!

[lewin5211]

What awussss! You should have said am i under arrest? Am i being detained? ANd when he said you have to id yourself when a police officer asks is only when you are being written a sumons, or you have committed a crime!

[Schutzstaffel23]

@mainemikeiii LMFAO you sound like a moron.

[maxinefour]

I can't get enough of this video ! Way to go!

[litning00]

@mainmikeiii especially .. LEOs need to understand the limits on their authority. The vehicle exception you mentioned as to do w/search of a vehicle incident to arrest; the LEO believes there may be weapons or evidence in a vehicle, AFTER an arrest has been performed BEFORE a search warrant has been issued. All the exceptions which exist are exceptions to the 4th Amendment REQUIREMENT that a warrant be issued before search. There is NO exception for this kind of random intrusive harrassment.