Roland Garros doesn t deserve to be a grand chelem, it s so slow, it advantage lame tennis players. But many people say that Nadal became great sooner than Federer. Ok but Federer had to deal with great players like Corratja, Kuerten, Safin at his great time, Sampras in Wimbly, Hewitt at his great time,Kafelnikov,Pioline,Nalbandian at his top and so on. So I totally disagree with this fake idea about Nadal's precocity cause you have to ignore maybe the most important period of the tennis history
Funny how the commentator is completely oblivious of the fact that he is talking about the GOAT. He's like "a forehand winner from Federer. Big deal..."
Roland Garros doesn t deserve to be a grand chelem, it s so slow, it advantage lame tennis players. But many people say that Nadal became great sooner than Federer. Ok but Federer had to deal with great players like Corratja, Kuerten, Safin at his great time, Sampras in Wimbly, Hewitt at his great time,Kafelnikov,Pioline,Nalbandian at his top and so on. So I totally disagree with this fake idea about Nadal's precocity cause you have to ignore maybe the most important period of the tennis history
simplemonde 1 month ago
hot chick at 3:57 LOL
DIEGO30081992 8 months ago
hot chick at 4:03
DIEGO30081992 8 months ago
@cys12141 Back in 2001 Federer hadn't even won a grand slam title yet .. he wasn't considered GOAT at that time...
soulskratch 10 months ago
Funny how the commentator is completely oblivious of the fact that he is talking about the GOAT. He's like "a forehand winner from Federer. Big deal..."
cys12141 10 months ago