israel Is not theReal deal they are the synaque of sat in lol.. Even Jews kno this anti semite and anti zionist, khazar, jesuits is totally diffrent God knows whats up..
Not in the republican party. Lets see when was the last time someone won the precidency or even came remotly close withotu being in one of the two top parties....
"Cfossedal," it seems you only agree with CERTAIN parts of our Constitution. You are in disagreement with the part that sets aside the Supreme Court as the entity that ultimately decides Constitutional rulings. How the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution is FAR from irrelevant, my friend. It was so relevant to the Founding Fathers that they laid it all out very clearly so opinions like yours could not decide to do away with them. So, the ONLY legitimate interpretation IS made by the court.
Whether the Supreme Court disagrees or not is irrelavant as far as the interpretation of the Constitution is concerned; the only legitimate interpretation of articles is the one that was originally set forth: that the the ruling powers only derive their powers from the consent of the governed. I do only support the GOVERNMENT when it supports the only legitimate interpretation of the Constitution, which is very clear.
BTW: I am RIGHT-WING, and I DO believe that everyone should be a soldier.
"Asso-shee," you have done a complete 180 degrees on your arguments, therefore conceding your DOUCHE-NESS. Yes, unauthorized access to private property is protected, but you must be too stupid to discern the difference between that & listening in to phone conversations through an "illegal" scanner. You are wrong on all counts and have furthermore shown yourself to be the biggest DOUCHE ever, and should adhrere to your own comment, "more brain, less mouth." You my friend are a Class-A dimwit.
"backwoodsmister", if you could figure out how to read, you would see that I have already corrected my spelling of the word "CONSPIRACY", but you have such a hard on to prove you're self an douchebag, that you must have missed it!!! And you are right, scanners are not illegal in ALL 50 states, but then again it's still legal to carry a fire-arm in AZ so that doesn't say much. The right to privacy is protected as it concerns unautherized access to "private" property. So go die in fire!!!
"Akoshee," Not only did you misspell "CONSPIRACY," not only are you so fucking STUPID that you claim we are guaranteed "the right to privacy," (Google: "The right to privacy: is it protected?") but you show what an utter retard you are when you claim scanners are "illegal." Go to the RadioShack website, type in "Police Scanner." Radio waves are FREE and I can listen to the cops, and hear cell conversations of douches like you telling the world how "smart" they are. Quit smoking crack, asshole.
good
032312200 3 years ago
Could Semore sing, "THANK YOU GOD FOR GASOLINE. I COULD USE A FEW GALLONS IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN." In the Johnny Paycheck style of Country music.
Crypto7Jocko0 3 years ago
israel Is not theReal deal they are the synaque of sat in lol.. Even Jews kno this anti semite and anti zionist, khazar, jesuits is totally diffrent God knows whats up..
ballpark4 3 years ago
Not in the republican party. Lets see when was the last time someone won the precidency or even came remotly close withotu being in one of the two top parties....
NEVER
Roenazarrek 3 years ago
"Cfossedal," it seems you only agree with CERTAIN parts of our Constitution. You are in disagreement with the part that sets aside the Supreme Court as the entity that ultimately decides Constitutional rulings. How the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution is FAR from irrelevant, my friend. It was so relevant to the Founding Fathers that they laid it all out very clearly so opinions like yours could not decide to do away with them. So, the ONLY legitimate interpretation IS made by the court.
backwoodsmister 3 years ago
Whether the Supreme Court disagrees or not is irrelavant as far as the interpretation of the Constitution is concerned; the only legitimate interpretation of articles is the one that was originally set forth: that the the ruling powers only derive their powers from the consent of the governed. I do only support the GOVERNMENT when it supports the only legitimate interpretation of the Constitution, which is very clear.
BTW: I am RIGHT-WING, and I DO believe that everyone should be a soldier.
Cfossedal 3 years ago
"Asso-shee," you have done a complete 180 degrees on your arguments, therefore conceding your DOUCHE-NESS. Yes, unauthorized access to private property is protected, but you must be too stupid to discern the difference between that & listening in to phone conversations through an "illegal" scanner. You are wrong on all counts and have furthermore shown yourself to be the biggest DOUCHE ever, and should adhrere to your own comment, "more brain, less mouth." You my friend are a Class-A dimwit.
backwoodsmister 3 years ago
"backwoodsmister", if you could figure out how to read, you would see that I have already corrected my spelling of the word "CONSPIRACY", but you have such a hard on to prove you're self an douchebag, that you must have missed it!!! And you are right, scanners are not illegal in ALL 50 states, but then again it's still legal to carry a fire-arm in AZ so that doesn't say much. The right to privacy is protected as it concerns unautherized access to "private" property. So go die in fire!!!
Akoshee 3 years ago
"Akoshee," Not only did you misspell "CONSPIRACY," not only are you so fucking STUPID that you claim we are guaranteed "the right to privacy," (Google: "The right to privacy: is it protected?") but you show what an utter retard you are when you claim scanners are "illegal." Go to the RadioShack website, type in "Police Scanner." Radio waves are FREE and I can listen to the cops, and hear cell conversations of douches like you telling the world how "smart" they are. Quit smoking crack, asshole.
backwoodsmister 3 years ago
RON PAUL is still in. !
112namrepus 3 years ago