$unday $chool Dance Cla$$ Parody
Uploader Comments ( tbtspark )
All Comments (191)
-
/watch?v=lplcRdNDcps&feature=c
hannel_video_title k i was just watching a few vids and i watched this and this reminded me that how u think that dating rocks is inaccurate. well if u watch this pls answer back and tell me wat u think about it -
sick-ass rhymes
-
it actually has been observed and i keep telling u to go on talkorigin. org they answer most of ur questions. they will debunk plenty of ur claims just how so many scientist have already. but u seem not to value evidence and if u cant do that then this argument will have to be over.
-
well 1st of all science doesnt teach u wat to think. everything i say has evidence and i have given u site and documentaries of the evidence. i even told to read Richard Dawkins books of the evidence of evolution. ur just getting a little offended just because i tease ur religion and how DELUDED you must be to think that the earth is 6000 years old. even though its not even close. you sir have not provided evidence of anything. Ex:noahs ark, and young earth or better yet the bible
-
- I teach youth how 2 think more than what 2 think. They can identify ur many logical fallacies. They can identify the difference between evidence & interpretations. They know the difference between historical & observational sciences. They know ad hominem attacks (name calling) are used by those w/ weak arguments. They know the difference between natural selection & "macro" evo. They could identify the logical inconsistency of ur subjective morality. They also disagree respectfully
-
- You didn't give evidence, we both have the same evidence, whale fossils. We have different interpretations of the same evidences. Snakes losing their legs is a loss of information not a gain of information. You need to show a gain in new information, new structures. Disease is a loss of info. Hair is the same info. Show a mechanism that can create new info in DNA. That has never been observed & is against what we know from information theory (Dr. Werner Gitt)
-
/watch?v=MeSSwKffj9o&feature=g
-vrec&context=G25f2cc0RVAAAAAA AACQ your religion. -
all i could say is that u sir are a deluded person and cant value evidence. i feel bad for the people wo go to ur youth group. you are teaching them false info.
-
there isnt real evidence of anything you say. whales have hind legs and u think there part of sexual reproduction but there not and i have given out plenty of evidence that there not. did u know snakes have hind legs inside there bodies. those are evidence that evolution happened. noahs ark never happened 4000 yrs ago but u still believe in fairy tales and of course im gonna call creationist names and get over it.
-
what? scientist arent trying to do macro evolution and flies and bacteria. go to a bookstore and purchase stuff about this stuff. i was reading them to day. there just making them better fit for survival. medical science uses evolution to improve medications and scientist all around the world say that.
- Loading comment...
watch?v=w5369-OobM4&feature=channel_video_title this is just made easy for YOU. you could go on talkorigin. org where it was made by scientist or read a science book. but the earth is at least 4 billion years old not 6 thousand.
imation879 3 months ago
- Off the top of my head, Evidence for a "young" Earth: #1 The Bible, in the same way your birth certificate is a reliable eyewitness record of your age #2 Polonium Radiohalos! #3 absence of erosion or the activity of living things (at the upper surface of the various strata), #4 bent strata layers (laid quickly & bent while soft), #4-5 Oceans would have more mud & salt, #6 human population would be huge, #7-8 the magnetic field of Mercury & the planet's density, etc.
tbtspark in reply to imation879 (Show the comment) 3 months ago