WTC2 Exploded - Slowmotion

Looking at the blastformations, it's obvious what happens here as a uniform blastwave occurs well below the beginning collapse. Especially notice what happens to the corner where the little flash is occuring. (This flash is more sharp in the original clip).
What also strikes me in this video, is the smoke ABOVE the falling tower and the smoke formations from WTC1. What are the cross-like white and black things, and the black spots, all seen in other clips too? It also looks like there is one or two of those double-light-objects flying around?!

Please also watch:
WTC2 Exploded - Details #1

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• 9/11
• WTC
• WTC1
• WTC2
• World
• Trade
• Center
• September
• Explosion
• Slowmotion
• Demolition
• Crunch
• Blast
• Hit
• Zoom
• Atomic
• Core
• Nuclear
• Science

[waltv79]

Any structural engineer could tell you that the impact damaged the structural collums. You have about 3 times as much weight on this tower at the point of impact. This heavy weight is what caused this tower to collapse first. As the metal softened from the intense heat created by the jet fuel the weight caused the sturctural support collumn to fail. on the first tower hit it took the collumn to actually melt. You can find fottage of the molten metal falling from that building.

[clauzii]

It's a misconception that the jet-fuel burned any longer than MAX.(!) 10 minutes. Also acc. to the official 'theory'....

[clauzii]

The official story says it was because it was hit lower. I thought about this, looked at the official damage repports (mainly FEMAs), and came to the conclusion that it might have been hit lower - but that doesn't make fire burn quicker or hotter. So You are absolutely right - HOW?!

[GodlyVayne]

wow you sound exactly like george bush. scientists found a lot of thermite in the rubble, along with molten steel. you know what thermite is? it burns up to 4500 dergrees fahrenheit. jet fuel burns up to 550 degrees fahrenheit. steel melts around 2500 degrees. and ANY structural engineer could tell you that no steel frame building has EVER collapsed from a fire, until 9/11. george bush is the real terrorist.

[sacopenapa]

@clauzii

which plnet you live in? May you failed miserably on your physics studies. Structural engineers are asking for 9/11 truth. Check their video analysis of the noerth tower collapse/demilition.

Steel does not melt that easy, unless you use nanothermite.

[bigbopper993]

@waltv79 hahahaha,,,,,,,r u fucked in the head????,,,,,,,,you are so completely and totally brainwashed if you believe that load of shit!!!

[SkuIICrusherGhost]

@clauzii Notice the air squibs due to the air trying to escape out ward, the cores stood longer so no demolition was possible.

Ya all need a pill to calm down the RAGE and Hate Towards the Great G.W.B.

[djsuploaded]

Yawn. Rip.

[Matu1]

Well i feel sorry for you for denying all this evidence just because it was "hard to do". Nanothermite found in dust(and iron-rich spheres),pools of molten metal on all 3 sites, 1100 victims never found(no piece large enough to find for dna sample)!! 60% of 9/11 commisioners had conflicts of intrest and some of them said it was set up to fail. Workers from WTC claimed weird activities prior 9/11(such like large bangs and alot of dust in work places). And there alot more, im out of letters.

[omidahomi]

@wiez5 : They still came down without resistance which is physically impossible on it own. That building was steel framed withe 47 inner steal colums,

[sacopenapa]

@clauzii

That is beautiful, how to you explain the collapse of WTC7???

[TheSupr3m3]

@waltv79 "You can find fottage of the molten metal falling from that building. "

There is no way any oxygen/Kerosine fire could've caused that,

[BizarreMike666]

@waltv79 Where did you copy & paste that from?