MHFM - SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,193
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 1, 2011

Ken Bird describes his one time relationship with Most Holy Family Monastery and explains why he still refers to their material from time to time as well as follow their debates and YouTube Programs. Many people including friends of of mine seem to have a misunderstanding as to what my opinion of them really amounts to and I think a clarification at this point is necessary. This video is not intended in anyway to slander their organization it is merely to explain my relationship with them as it happened and why it ended.

MHFM Website:
www.vaticancatholic.com

MHFM YouTube Channel:
www.youtube.com/mhfm1

Also check out my other video call Michael Voris Exposed - Again

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Kenbird1)

  • Here are my comments:

    1. Pius XII was a heretic, Mason and antipope.

    2. The first of the modern antipopes was Leo XIII (his successors were also heretics).

    3. This means that 1917 'Code of Canon Law' and it's support of BoD are false, unlawful and heretical.

    Please visit my channel and watch the video "Masonic Infiltration and Dimond Capitulation" to see how the Dimonds hide the evidence that Pacelli was a Mason and auto-excommunicated for his support of and association with them.

  • @davecyco Here is my answer

    1. Pius XII was not a heretic, you are stupid and have no idea what you are talking about

    2. Leo XIII was a good man, a good pope, and died a good death.

    3. You are wrong about the Code and you do not understand papal infallibility

    I will not visit your channel, I will not waste my time.

  • Please visit w ww.youtube.com/user/mhfm1 for critical information for your soul.

    Please do not ignore this chance to learn of the one true faith!

    (When debating MHFM Ken Bird said that he could not go back to believing in BOD for catechumens since all the evidence was shown and explained to him. He said that he would be a liar to go back to the position. Well what do you know, he returned to his false belief and doesn't admit that he's a liar but tries to justify himself.)

  • @UltimateTacoman If BOD & BOB is false then how are there Saints who were not physically baptized on earth? Why does the code of Canon Law approve it? You can say its not infallible but that is a lie, it was given to the universal Church. The Latin Church is considered the Universal Church, but to further prove it the same code was issued to the east and Bod is taught there as well.

Top Comments

  • @325nicaea It's apparent that you have absolutely no clue of what you flap about. Pick up a book and read it, do something useful rather than trying to throw your self righteous fat self around on the Internet.

see all

All Comments (57)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I have a good impression of Michael and Peter. I've actually talked with them on the phone and they've sent me I don't know how many free videos. The Catholic Church is at its best when its intellectual and honest about what's happening today...then I get REALLY close to the Church. But sadly, most Catholics are dimwits and totally unworthy of Christ. They seem to have lost the creative and intellectual urge and believe that following the rules and opposing abortion is enough.

  • Consider the parable of the Pharisee and the Publican and the value of humility.

  • Your last sentence is surprising when considering that you called Suprema haec sacra magesterial. Suprema haec sacra explicitly says that the "desire does not to be explicit as in the case of catechumens". (The modernist version of the term "explicit" does not mean "expressed with words" but means as much as "existent", while "implicit" does not mean "fallowing from the explicit" but rather "not existent but existent".)

    How can you have it both ways?

  • In order to become a Catholic one must be baptized. An unbaptized Catechumen is not a Catholic until he joins the Catholic Church through baptism.

    Baptism of desire comes from the human mind and contradicts directly what God has revealed. While the Dogma always remained the same rejecting the idea that anyone could be saved without the waters of baptism and without the Catholic faith, the concepts for salvation of unpaptized or heretics have changed many times.

  • I agree, we need to hold conferences and address Rome and call them out on this apostasy. I agree MHFM is not joining arms. However, I think you are confusing love with emotion. I think if you could have seen Padre Pio and how he was called "grumpy" by many, you could see that Michael is a lot like that. He knows and believes that Heresy is the enemy of the Church. Heretics are people and do exist, and Diamond calls them out.

  • God's love and mercy IS His Sacraments and His Church. His commandment to go out and preach the gospel and to Baptize everyone in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is absolute. The Catholic Church defends Christs' absolute Truths. Does it seem impossible to Baptize everyone on the planet who need to be? Is that why you believe in BOD? I mean, what is your excuse? Christ's Mercy? Christ said, what is impossible for man is possible for the Father. Now, that takes FAITH to hear. 

  • The MHFM brothers are down the wrong road. They DO NOT love. Don't follow them to hell.

    Peace, brother.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more