Evolution Debunked.flv

Evolution Debunked

by:KeithTruth....http://www.youtube.com/user/KeithTruth




The great debate is over..

evil-lie-tion is debunked
What would constitute objective proof of God? Well, consider the following self-evident and universally recognized truth: Concept and design necessitate an intelligent designer. The presence of intelligent design proves the existence of an intelligent designer. It's simply cause and effect. In our search for proof of God's existence, we could examine the various claims of supernatural occurrences, determine whether or not these are legitimate experiences, and build a case for the existence of the supernatural, which would be a step towards identifying a supernatural Creator God. Or we can just apply what we already know and search for signs of intelligent design within creation itself.

We know that design necessitates a designer. In fact, in accordance with this fundamental axiom, design detection methodology is a prerequisite in many fields of human endeavor, including archaeology, anthropology, forensics, criminal jurisprudence, copyright law, patent law, reverse engineering, crypto analysis, random number generation, and SETI. And how do we recognize intelligent design? In general, we find "specified complexity" to be a reliable indicator of the presence of intelligent design. Chance can explain complexity alone but not specification -- a random sequence of letters is complex but not specified (it's meaningless). A Shakespearean sonnet is both complex and specified (it's meaningful). We can't have a Shakespearean sonnet without Shakespeare. (William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities, 1998.)

Proof of God - Nature
So where's the proof of God's existence? In accordance with our familiar axiom and in light of the tremendous advances we've made in molecular biology, biochemistry, genetics and information theory, the proof of God is all around us!

Through the microscope, we observe the E. coli bacterial flagellum. The bacterial flagellum is what propels E. coli bacteria through its microscopic world. It consists of about 40 individual protein parts including a stator, rotor, drive-shaft, U-joint, and propeller. It's a microscopic outboard motor! The individual parts come into focus when magnified 50,000 times (using electron micrographs). And even though these microscopic outboard motors run at an incredible 100,000 rpm, they can stop on a microscopic dime. It takes only a quarter turn for them to stop, shift directions and start spinning 100,000 rpm in the opposite direction! The flagellar motor has two gears (forward and reverse), is water-cooled, and is hardwired into a signal transduction (sensory mechanism) so that it receives feedback from its environment. ("Unlocking the Mystery of Life," video documentary by Illustra Media, 2002.) When we apply the general principles of detecting specified complexity to biologic systems (living creatures), we find it reasonable to infer the presence intelligent design. Take, for example, the bacterial flagellum's stator, rotor, drive-shaft, U-joint, and propeller. It is not convenient that we've given these parts these names - that's truly their function. If you were to find a stator, rotor, drive-shaft, U-joint, or propeller in any vehicle, machine, toy or model, you would recognize them as the product of an intelligent source. No one would expect an outboard motor -- much less one as incredible as the flagellar motor -- to be the product of a chance assemblage of parts. Motors are the product of intelligent design.

Furthermore, the E. coli bacterial flagellum simply could not have evolved gradually over time. The bacterial flagellum is an "irreducibly complex" system. An irreducibly complex system is one composed of multiple parts, all of which are necessary for the system to function. If you remove any one part, the entire system will fail to function. Every individual part is integral. There is absolutely no naturalistic, gradual, evolutionary explanation for the bacterial flagellum. (Michael Behe, Darwin's Black Box, 1996.)

The bacterial flagellum (not to mention the irreducibly complex molecular machines responsible for the flagellum's assembly) is just one example of the specified complexity that pervades the microscopic biological world. Molecular biologist Michael Denton wrote, "Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10-12 grams, each is in effect a veritable micro-miniaturized factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machinery built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world." (Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1986, p. 250

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Daniel.Morris
• Daniel Morris
• morris766126
• free
• free stuff
• money
• sex
• girls
• dope
• religion
• atheist
• atheism
• Christ
• Christianity
• life
• love
• health
• truth
• marriage
• Britney spears
• evolution
• war
• oil
• marketing
• how to
• and
• but
• therefore
• is
• where
• why
• for
• help.etc.

[demorris766126]

WHAT IS REALLY FUNNY MOST PEOPLE LOOK AT THE TITLE AND GO RUNNING OFF AT THE MOUTH WITHOUT EVEN VIEWING THE VIDEO

[demorris766126]

SURE MAN CAN MANIPULATE CELLS AND CALL IT EVOLUTION BUT MAN CAN NOT CREATE FROM NOTHING AND THAT IS WHAT WAS HERE BEFORE CREATION .... NOTHING .... USE YOUR HEAD

[jib1000]

Wow.

This video is devoid of any rational thought. The parts that weren't outright lies are just idiotic leaps of flawed logic.

Get this through your heads people: EVOLUTION IS A FACT. ITS BEEN OBSERVED IN THE LAB AND IN THE NATURAL WORLD. WE"VE OBSERVED NEW SPECIES EVOLVING!!!!!

[demorris766126]

@jib1000 HAVE YOU OBSERVED THIS ? I THINK NOT ,MAYBE YOU EVOLVED FROM AN APE LMAO BELIEVE AL THE BS YOU LIKE , DO ACTUAL RESEARCH FOR YOURSELF AND STOP BELIEVING SOMETHING YOU HEARD FROM SOMEONE ELSE

[demorris766126]

SCIENCE IS A FUNNY THING , SO CALLED SCIENTIFIC FACT IS MOST ALWAYS DIS-PROVED BY ANOTHER SCIENTIST .. WE CAN LOOK BACK 100 YEARS AND SEE WE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THEN AND IF THE WORLD IS HERE ANOTHER 100 WE WILL BE LOOKED ON AS IDIOTS , ANY ONE WHO BELIEVES IN SCIENCE AND NOT GOD IS CARNAL MINDED AND AN IDIOT , IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT LITTLE WE DO KNOW AND REALIZE HOW RIDICULOUS THE IDEA THAT LIFE OCCURRED BY CHANCE OR ACCIDENT YOU WOULD KNOW IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE

[buffboynick]

There are various forms of energy that we know currently exist but its theorized by scientists that alternate forms of energy exist within this universe/dimension.

We know about some like..... potential energy, kinetic energy, dark energy, etc

These various forms of energy are NOT bound by the 3D world (3rd dimension) because energy contains NO ATOMS___FACT

Anything that contains atoms has an expiration date.

Atoms are particles generated from the upper dimensions that produce a 3D reality.

[buffboynick]

@lethalsub

Uh no.

"Religious" is an adjective describing someone belonging to a religion.

I am "spiritual" which is 180 degrees different.

The Human-looking aliens (Vegans, Andromedans, Agarthans, Pleiadians, aka Nordics) all say that the soul exists and its ultimate goal is to eventually merge back with the source (the creator)

Last time I checked....

Christians think aliens are "demons" and that when you die.....you either go to heaven or hell.

So yeah, you're an IDIOT

[ElectricModel]

You make some very good points debunking evolution; However, claiming that by disproving evolution you automatically prove creation would be making the very same mistake you're trying to raise awareness against. Evolution is growing weaker with every fossil we find and don't find and creation still has no scientific basis whatsoever therefor lets keep things objective, aside from that I would say good work bro.

[Liminalplace1]

eg. crocodile and sharks, and even cockroaches - question for anti-evolutionist is why there is not fossils of all present species? And why there are many different extinct species in the fossil record? Evolution suggests they do not survive but gentic modiications from them did. i you have a problem religiously about Evolution have a look at BioLogos.

[Liminalplace1]

The most unusual feature of this video is the use of fossils of species that have not changed as if that disproves evolution, it fails to even understand the common idea of "survival of the fittest" - those species were fit for their environments so they have survived -

[Liminalplace1]

Yes, certain skulls discoveries are renamed as no being direct ancestors of modern humans, but it is the evolutionary scientists that debate these things -that is honest.So why the "dishonest" label. Fossil formation is rare so why do people think they are ever going to find all the details in the Fossil record? What is present does not conlict with the theory,

[Liminalplace1]

As a qualified anthropologist I can say this is a very strange video. It uses the quotes of scientists to suggest they question "decent with modification", when in fact they are just refining the details - that is what science does, there is debate, but the fact of evolution is accepted.

[Ashenshugura]

@demorris766126 I personally would rather live in a world where evidence is scrutinized and challenged in order to help us as humans get closer to the truth. Instead of mudslinging and calling out someone who does not believe in what you do an idiot why not simply accept the fact that it is a beneficial thing to have various outlooks on matters?

[jib1000]

First of all you can't prove that something doesn't exist. The problem lies with people who believe in god. If you believe that god created life then YOU HAVE TO PROVE IT. Since there isn't ANY evidence that god created life, abiogenesis is the only game in town right now. Chirality DOES NOT disprove abiogenesis btw, try reading a book. You keep saying that evolution is responsible for for the first living thing which of course it isn't, thats ABIOGENESIS. Get your self an education.

[flexpape]

@jib1000 Mate you are taking me wrong. I am saying the exact same point that THEY ARE DIFFERENT. If they are different then Someone tell me Why people say that evolution proves the non existence of God? Every one now know that because of charility and RNA reproduction the abiogenesis is hoax But then who created species Ofc some super being :D. ThiS IS my point. Most of people never know what is the difference and they claim that evolution is responsible not God.

[jib1000]

@flexpape Ive told you how you can find proof of evolution. Type "observed speciation" into google. You refuse to do this.

You can also type abiogenesis into google and learn about the different hypotheses there. You still seem to think that evolution and abiogenesis are the same thing. They're not. Evolution is a proven fact, one day abiogenesis maybe too, right now its just a best guess, but its certainly better than saying goddidit.

[flexpape]

@jib1000 i would say desperately trying to prove it right lol? Cmon SHow me the proof that we are created by random chemical processes lool. Cmon u can't produce things in sophisticated laboratory and u trying to believe that miracles happened on their own?