Stanford would announce a name maybe someone whod landed a £2 million deal. There and then, that person would be given a £200,000 cheque for commission. Then theyd say, And heres a bonus, too, and give the person another cheque for £300,000.
I know that the SEC are leeches of the system; BUT Stanford is a maggot that has no defence on his case, loosing the bank by doing nothing.
Stanford is not the guilty one: the SEC are ! Check out the facts. He is a useful 'agent' to these deaf, dumb & blind "regulators" who are corrupt and fraudulent, and live as predators feeding off their scapegoats !
I hope he rot in prison.
MinhKhai1 3 weeks ago
LABAMAILLIWDRAWDE
ALLENSTANFORDOWN
LOVEME2TIMESKGRAYE
ALLENSTANFORDOWN
LABAMAILLIWDRAWDE
Sure yeah rite-Play you song ding dong.
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
EDWARD I C K E D A G A I N
FINGERLICKALELCDEESG
EDWARDALLENSTANFORD
FINGERLICKALELCDEESG
EDWARD I C K E D A G A I n
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
From Dailymail:
Stanford would announce a name maybe someone whod landed a £2 million deal. There and then, that person would be given a £200,000 cheque for commission. Then theyd say, And heres a bonus, too, and give the person another cheque for £300,000.
I know that the SEC are leeches of the system; BUT Stanford is a maggot that has no defence on his case, loosing the bank by doing nothing.
GUILTY is coming on.
Johnhighfive 3 years ago
Stanford is not the guilty one: the SEC are ! Check out the facts. He is a useful 'agent' to these deaf, dumb & blind "regulators" who are corrupt and fraudulent, and live as predators feeding off their scapegoats !
OneVoiceActionGroup 3 years ago