Prof. R. Dawkins... Knocked Out!!!

Watch how prof. Dawkins hasitates when hes asked a question about mutation. He fails to answer the question and tells the camera man to stop recording... In this video he is clearly knocked out!!

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Mutations
• Evolution
• natural
• selection
• Watch
• how
• prof.
• Dawkins
• hasitates
• when
• hes
• asked
• question
• about
• mutation.
• He
• fails
• to
• answer
• the
• and
• tells
• camera
• man
• stop
• recording...
• In
• this
• video
• he
• is
• clearly
• knocked
• out!!

[lilzeus7]

and when i say evoulation can be seen today. i dont mean there r completely new animals poppin up everywhere.

for example. If u take a group of grey kangaroos, and move them to a different location, like an island. And on that island the grey coat of the kangaroos were not good camoflage. Natural selection would take place and soon they find that the kangaroos develops a different colour coat and becomes a new species.

i am glossin of quickly because there is a work limit.

[awaisau393]

No matter how long natural selection goes on for, kangroos will always remain kangroos!!! Natural selection only selects fittest individuals within a species.

[lilzeus7]

Poorly constructed video. It proved nothing. It merely was edited to discredited a man who is a Professor in biology.

u argue all the facts that prove the theory of evolution. but there r no facts for creationism . I personally havnt looked up proofs for creationism because i didnt think any1 believed in such a silly idea.

next ur goin 2 be tellin me the world is only 2000 years old and that all the evidence points to this.

haha i hope u do some serious reseach some day.

[awaisau393]

My main aim is to prove that Evolution is nothing but a theory long been rejected by science. Every step of modren science points towards creation. Update ur scientific knowledge. No one has claimed that the earth or the world is 2000 years old. You evolutionists just love imagining things...

[chodaboy51500]

This is the lamest argument for creationism ever. What's this say. You take a video and edit it so that it makes someone look stumped. Why is the answer clipped out? He spent 11 seconds tying to come up with a good explanation for but you edit it out. You don't want anyone to hear the answer?

I find that MUCH more interesting and suspicious that the 11 second pause.

Instead of trying to discredit the accepted theory, why don't you formulate one and have it peer reviewed. I have yet to see one.

[awaisau393]

There was no answer!!! Dawkins told the camera man to stop recording and refused to complete the interview!!!

[ptango101]

Every time I see this in another incarnation it gets more and more repugnant. This piece of garbage is poorly edited and doesn't even have the person who did the original interview (who was a woman by the way). Why don't you creatards look into why he hesitated. He was lied to to get an interview. The pause is him realizing he has a bunch of creationists in his house under false pretenses. Isn't one of your commandments have something about bearing false witness. Hypocritical wankers!

[itsolive1]

@chodaboy51500 oh i gotcha.. but in the real interview he didn't even answer the question which annoyed be whatever im not gonna argue anymore :)

[chodaboy51500]

@awaisau393 "Kangaroos will always remain kangaroos"? That was possibly the worst example you could have come up with... Macropus agilis Macropus dorsalis Macropus eugenii Macropus greyii Macropus irma Macropus parma Macropus parryi Macropus rufogriseus Macropus antilopinus Macropus bernardus Macropus robustus Macropus rufus Macropus titan Macropus pearsoni Macropus fuliginosus Macropus giganteus

[chodaboy51500]

@jsekar711 No, but nature DOES create new forms of bacteria every day.

[chodaboy51500]

@itsolive1 No, I'm saying the answer was edited out in THIS video.

[chodaboy51500]

@itsolive1 I know. I'm asking WHY was it edited out.

Answer: Because this is the best tactic that creationists can come up with. By the way, the interviewer was a woman. So this is not just editing to make Prof. Dawkins look bad, it is a flat out lie and falsification.

[chodaboy51500]

@awaisau393 Partially correct. He asked the camera man to stop recording so that he could take the time to formulate a proper answer to the question it's done ALL the time in interviews. The rest of that is a lie, he completed the interview.

watch?v=WoXzF9zDy_k

This is the type of dishonesty I am talking about. It is only necessary when arguing from a position of weakness.