Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Zeitgeist debunked? Don't make me laugh! jesus is mithras says BBC

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,426
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 24, 2010

historians say zeitgeist is not debunked explains the british media jesus is mithras from BBC IQ

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (micap20078)

  • Is the video title intended to be sarcasm? You're holding up a fucking game show as a refutation to the debunking of Zeitgeist while insinuating that these people are historians, or that the BBC has fuck all authority when it comes to comparative theology.

    If it was meant to be sincere in any manner, then I can totally see how you'd be snowballed by Zeitgeist, being without any real critical thinking skills.

  • @Sinuev1 what are you saying dont trust the bbc cause thats just entering another conspiracy. but im sure you would reference them if they backng up your argument. and zeitgeist has not been refuted so do some more research.

see all

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The Romans adoption of Christianity was beneficial for peace in the region. As Josephus (Jewish but 'adopted' by the flavians) outlines in 'The War of the Jews' there were big tensions between Rome and the Jews. What better way to alleviate that than by creating a religion where the premise is mainly one of pacifism. There are two things to note here: the personality transformation between the old and new testament gods and the typography between the both testaments e.g. Jesus and Joseph

  • Any claim made about the validity and historical accuracy of the bible or of Jesus as a person is merely conjectural, so debate is mostly futile. There is no contiguous evidence to support claims of the existence of Jesus, the gospels of Paul came generations later and the reference to Christus by Titus Flavius (Josephus) is very tenuous and possibly tampered with

    It was common for Romans to adopt and adapt existing religions and embrace them for political and social gain e.g. Sulis Minerva.

  • Mithras was originally Mithra, a Persian god. The Roman version of Mithras didn't even come to the Roman empire until 2nd century CE.

  • @micap20078 if you believe zeitgeist, maybe you'd be interested in winning thousands of pounds if you can prove what that marxist pile of s**t claims in part 1.

    strange how no one has taken up that challenge......or won the money available. maybe it's because zeitgeist pt 1 is complete and utter B.S.

  • Mithras were not a roman god. he was adopted by Romans, but he was originally the deity from Zoroastrianism called Mithra. The Roman Mithras were not seen as a bull, but killed a bull he were neither of a virgin or ressurected.

  • Zeitgeist is 95 % bullshit and 5 % facts. According to Zeitgeist, fucking THOR of Nordic mythology was "Born by a virgin" and "Ressurected" and other things, related to the dear gangsta Jesus. :)

  • This is baseless as well. No evidence, only foolishness. Is this where you get your facts?

  • @micap20078 Zeitgeist HAS been refuted and it's BASELESS. Try to defend it.

  • Nice fact checking... they're reading this straight off the internet! lol

  • @unomnacajit111 mostly getting high and being super pro-abortion

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more