Do you think that one will do?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
581 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • oooh you figured out inflection lol j/k dude. i think the digital "methods" you describe for speech is the better option, you can have the right feeling but not be able to express it correctly if you do not have the words.. although as we see on the internet if there is NO analogue people get mad and argue and they dont even know why, its because they didnt SEE any communication, they only have their mind to evaluate the words, and do not know which words neededd inflection

  • Expanding The Lexicon?

  • Do you think that ONE Origin will do?

    So what or who is the Origin? A Google? A Youtube? A Youtube Channel? A single persons Youtube Channel? A Wiki Page? Is it a Microsoft? Is it a Apple? Is it a Star? Is it a Planet? Is it a...........?

    Seems to me that Human beings, need to think a little more beyond just videos and Analog and Digital.

  • You blew my mind.

  • Hello, Professor !

    My Grampa had one for my Grandma

    "You're right and I'm wrong as you usually are".

  • The words down here, come the voices of many of you up there.

  • The knife of the life is ended by the wifey material.

  • YOU are right and I am wrong, as you USUALLY are.

    You are right and I am WRONG, as YOU usually are.

    As to how we and animals both employ meaning based and data based intelligence.

    they enfold endlessly, as demonstrated by the digital output of my sentences above, which you understand in analog terms as well as the digital. I helped you along with the emphasis showing, just as you helped along with emphasis signals sent.

    I doubt you would have picked up on it otherwise

  • The life of the wife is ended by the knife.

  • So much material! Lacan, amazing. Thanks for the links. A notion i had yesterday was "a sample lost is equal to in gains but never exact". In saying, i can weight a communicate out in exact yes/no values and expect A: The dog will over do B: The dog will under do, to be consistent each time!. Now, back to Lacan. Later

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more