Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Dr Suzanna Hupp on Virginia Tech

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
92,953
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 18, 2007

Dr Suzanna Hupp, who lost her parents in the Luby's massacre in Texas, explaining why the right to carry concealed firearms might have helped at Virginia Tech.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @bcourter82

    As for why training and discipline are NOT requirements:

    1. Having a state requirement that must be satisfied reduces a right to a privilege. Rights are not privileges.

    2. As rights have inherent responsibilities, it's the person's responsibility to get training and discipline so he can use force properly and wisely should he decide to exercise his 2nd Amendment right. He's free not to get training and discipline, but he'll be subject to the potential consequences of that choice.

  • shes hot...still

see all

All Comments (762)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This woman is my hero.  The strength is awe inspiring.

  • @Watcher3223 I fully support your postition.

  • @hammerogod Well, now that is a much more intelligent way of making your case. I would have have to agree with you there!

  • @superflyenglishvegan

    You are probably right.

    But allow me to defend my statement.

    If the 9 people who gave this video, and/or Dr. Hupp's stand on gun control, a thumbs down had witnessed the helplessness of those people in Luby's or V.T. I sincerely doubt that they would have been so quick to dislike this video.

    I strongly believe it that the anti-gun group(s) automatically thumb down ALL pro-self defense videos and ALL reasonable arguments for an armed citizenry.

    And, therefore, reality.

  • @hammerogod I didn't say that I thought Hupp didn't have a valid, realistic point. I just think it's ugly to say that when you probably don't really mean it and I think you know that's sinking to a new low too. Either way, it's not helping the argument for the second.

  • @superflyenglishvegan

    It was mildly rude...or it was bluntly truthful.

    Either way, if one of Dr Hupp's parents or Dr Hupp herself would have been armed perhaps the 43 people who were killed or injured would have made it home in time for a football game on TV.

    Rude is being shot to death during lunch.

    Rude is not being able to defend your family.

    Rude is having to sit there and watch 43 people be shot.

    Rude is people thumbing down this video in a robotic liberal knee jerk anti-gun spasm.

  • @hammerogod That's just rude.

  • 9 people should have been eating lunch at Luby's in Killeen Texas on October 16, 1991 between 12:35 p.m. – 12:51 p.m.

  • @bcourter82 With any luck your "family" is not as mentally disabled as you are. However they are fucked none the less.

  • @dart1285 bingo. Also, I never said that republicans didn't support gun rights. I just compared the person I was arguing with TO a republican. Most republicans are "tough guys" or tough guy wannabes.

    I'm a liberal on most issues but all for gun rights.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more