An Empty Sun - Is Gravity being Induced?

LOL, should stick at painting...

Thanks, I think I'll take that as a compliment

The space density of non-space is just a space with very low density. Light is an interactive space system between lowdensity and highdensity space. Natural lightspeed can be increased by increasing the highdensity space part in the interactie system it is simular to "Conway's Game of Life". Probably some space characteristics and situation result in special states with a effect on neighboring space such as gravity also elementary particals are just such systems on a 'larger' scale.

You said, "...The space density of non-space is just a space with very low density..." You are in good company. The weight of the scientific community are squarely behind you. However, I suspect you - and they - are wrong. The only proof I can offer you is an experiment that's not been performed yet. I predict there is a gravitational induction at the moment of discharge near a z-pinch.

it's a common logical fallacy based around misconception of the cause and effect.

Low pressure does not create rotational motion in your cup of coffee. Instead rotational motion creates low pressure.

In the case of cup of coffee it's pretty obvious that SPOON causes matter to rotate, which is why we can observe the "pressure drop" in it's center.

Much more important is to understand what kind of "spoon" causes cyclones, planets, stars, and galaxies to rotate in the similar fasion

Hi Active storage, there's a bit of the 'chicken and egg thingee here, don't you think?
For hurricanes the 'spoon' would be the Coriolis effect., deflection of moving objects when they are viewed from a rotating reference frame, in this case a rotating planet.
I don't think we are dealing with a cause and effect fallacy. Rather, it is a manifestation of the forces of nature expressing itself from one scale to another.

Robert Kirkwood had published advanced mathematical aspects of the 'flow space theory in mainstream journals from 1939. Goodfellowss paper repeats the same idea: space and matter flow into (sink) Empty Sun and it is a source of Suns energy. In my view, there are over 100 theories of Space Flow Into Sink, Space burn to produce energy, and Empty Sun-like theories (including Russian theories). The first Empty Sun theory precedes Mr. Goodfellows paper by 400 years, therefore it is plagiarism.

Holetel5 introduced himself to me by accusing me of plagiarizing his work. I conclusively proved to the satisfaction of several forum moderators that my work precedes Holetel5 (aka Constantine Leshan) papers by sixteen years. His immediate response has been to rake through old papers in an attempt to discredit his betters. I have answered his accusations point for point on various science forums, I'm not going to do it here. If he lived in the same country I do, I'd sue him for slander.

Goodfellow's theory plagiarizes the Huygens (1669) theory of gravitation by that bodies must consist mostly of 'Empty Space' (or Non-space) so that the aether can penetrate the bodies easily, which is necessary for mass proportionality. According to Huygens the Sun is empty. Space flow into Empty Sun, it is a cause of gravitation. Yarkovsky in 1888 argued that the absorbed by bodies aether might be converted into new matter (energy), leading to a mass increase of the celestial bodies.

Bitter recriminations from an enraged 2nd stringer.